Teachers’ Beliefs and the Flipped Classroom in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study of Science Instruction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i3.191

Keywords:

Beliefs, Flipped Classroom, Secondary Science Teachers, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

This qualitative study, grounded in Dewey’s constructivist theory, explores how six Saudi Arabian secondary school science teachers view and use the flipped classroom as an active learning approach. The research adds to the growing conversation about science education in Saudi Arabia, especially in light of Saudi Vision 2030, which aims to bring more technology and innovative teaching strategies like the flipped classroom into schools. Using a case study design, the study draws on interviews, classroom observations, group discussions, and teaching materials to understand teachers’ beliefs. The findings show that teachers hold a mix of views about using the flipped classroom, including ideas about teaching science, their students’ learning, their own roles as teachers, and how all of this connects to the goals of Saudi Vision 2030. Teachers seemed most influenced by their beliefs about science teaching and their professional roles. The results suggest that teachers are more likely to adopt new teaching methods when those methods fit with what they already believe is effective. This highlights why it’s so important to consider teachers’ beliefs and experiences when rolling out new strategies like the flipped classroom as part of educational reforms. The findings yield two key implications. First, educational reforms introducing transformative instructional approaches, such as the flipped classroom, should explicitly account for teachers’ beliefs. Teachers’ belief systems are complex, dynamic, and central to instructional decision-making; consequently, they strongly influence whether new pedagogical approaches are adopted, adapted, or resisted. Ignoring these beliefs may limit the effectiveness and sustainability of reform efforts. Second, curriculum developers integrating flipped classroom approaches into science curricula should actively incorporate teachers’ perspectives during the design process. As practitioners with direct classroom experience, teachers possess critical insights into what is pedagogically viable, as well as the potential strengths and challenges associated with implementing innovative instructional strategies.

References

Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2016). The impact of science teachers’ beliefs on teaching science: The case of Saudi science teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p233

Alajlan, H. A. (2022). Performance, participation and perception of computer education students toward flipped learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09590-1

Alamri, M. M. (2019). Students’ academic achievement performance and satisfaction in a flipped classroom in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.096786

Al-Harthi, A. S. (2008). The relationship between science teacher’s beliefs about the use of the inquiry based learning strategy and their classroom practices. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman].

Al-Jaid, B. (2019). Challenges faced by Arabic language teachers in using flipped classrooms: Perspectives of middle school teachers in Taif Governorate. Journal of the College of Education (Assiut), 35(1), 384-412. Retrieved from https://mfes.journals.ekb.eg/article_104918.html?lang=en

Alkış Küçükaydın, M., & Gökbulut, Y. (2020). Beliefs of teacher candidates toward science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1673603

Allmnakrah, A., & Evers, C. (2020). The need for a fundamental shift in the Saudi education system: Implementing the Saudi Arabian Economic Vision 2030. Research in Education, 106(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523719851534

Alotaibi, R. S. (2021). The adoption of digital transformation in the Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.159

Antwi, S.K. and Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: a philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7, 217-225.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Why flipped classrooms are here to stay. Education Week, 45(2), 17-41. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-why-flipped-classrooms-are-here-to-stay/2012/06

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Ciesielska, M., Boström, K.W., Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation methods. In M. Ciesielska & D. Jemielniak (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies in organization studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. Minton.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Dewey, J. (1958). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5

Durán Narváez, N. C., Lastra Ramírez, S. P., & Morales Vasco, A. M. (2013). Autobiographies: A way to explore student-teachers’ beliefs in a teacher education program. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 15(2), 35-47.

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Using technology to revolutionize cooperative learning: An opinion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01156

Kaymakamoglu, S. E. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs, perceived practice and actual classroom practice in relation to traditional (teacher-centered) and constructivist (learner-centered) teaching (note 1). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p29

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Koh, J. H. L. (2019). Four pedagogical dimensions for understanding flipped classroom practices in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 19(4), 14-33.

Kumatongo, B., & Muzata, K. K. (2021). Research paradigms and designs with their application in education. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology 5(1), 16-32.

Lin, H. C. & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model, Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462

Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-215). Sage.

Liu, D. & Zhang, H. (2022). Improving students’ higher order thinking skills and achievement using WeChat-based flipped classroom in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7281-7302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10922-y

Ministry of Education (2018). Ministry of Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from https://moe.gov.sa/en/Pages/default.aspx

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299-325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004130031247

Sanders, E. J., Keegan, L. C., Culshaw, M., & Tomes, C. (2022). The flipped classroom model as applied to an augmentative and alternative communication course. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 6(1),1-12. https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD6.1.1649037808.641379

Shufutinsky, A. (2020). Employing use of self for transparency, rigor, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative organizational research methods. Organization Development Review, 52(1), 50-58.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. Proceedings from the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132

Ültanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 1-18.

Uzuntiryaki, E., Boz, Y., Kirbulut, D., & Bektas, O. (2010). Do pre-service chemistry teachers reflect their beliefs about constructivism in their teaching practices? Research in Science Education, 40(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9127-z

van Wyk, M. M. (2020). Student teachers’ lived experiences of an ODeL flipped instructional design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 10(4), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2020100102

Xu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). Application of constructivist theory in flipped classroom-take college English teaching as a case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(7), 880-887. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0807.21

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research, design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

Alanazi, F., Subramaniam, K., Long, C. S., Librea-Carden, M. R., & Khan, N. (2026). Teachers’ Beliefs and the Flipped Classroom in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study of Science Instruction. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i3.191

Similar Articles

41-50 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.