Instructional Design and Students’ Performance: The Role of the ASSURE Model in Teaching Genetics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i2.140

Keywords:

Academic Performance, ASSURE Instructional Design Model, Genetics, Traditional Approach

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of the ASSURE instructional design model on the academic performance of Senior High School (SHS) students in genetics concepts in Ghana. The research was prompted by persistent conceptual challenges faced by biology students in genetics, as documented in prior studies and WAEC Chief Examiners’ Reports. These challenges often result in poor academic outcomes, particularly in topics such as DNA, chromosomes, inheritance, and variation. To address this issue, the study employed a quasi-experimental design using a pre-test/post-test non-equivalent control group. A total of 104 SHS 3 Biology students from four intact classes in the Bawku, Pusiga, and Garu Districts of the Upper East Region were randomly assigned to either an experimental group taught using the ASSURE model or a control group taught using traditional methods. The Genetics Concept Test (GCT), developed by the researchers, was used to assess students’ understanding before and after the intervention. Pre-test results showed the control group outperforming the experimental group. However, post-test analysis using ANCOVA revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group’s performance (M = 23.938, SE = 0.279) compared to the control group (M = 19.483, SE = 0.268; F (1,101) = 121.251, p =.001), with a large effect size (Partial Eta Squared = 0.546). Furthermore, no significant gender differences were found in the experimental group’s post-test scores, suggesting that the ASSURE model supports equitable learning outcomes. The study concludes that the ASSURE instructional design model enhances students’ academic performance in genetics and is gender-sensitive. It recommends its integration into biology instruction to improve conceptual understanding and performance, especially in regions with historically low achievement in genetics.

References

Aljohani, M. (2017). Principles of “constructivism” in foreign language teaching. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 7(1), 97–107. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/583d2297ba95a.pdf

Amoah, C. A., Gyang, N. O., & Agbosu, A. A. (2018). Assessing the planning skills of biology students in selected senior high schools in Eastern Region of Ghana. International Journal of Science and Research, 7(4), 657–662.

Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. Retrieved from https://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-5%20Issue-6/Version-1/I05616670.pdf

Basu, R. (2018). Instructional design models: Benefits and challenges. UGC Approved Journal, 41(1), 31–36.

Bosu, L. (2022). Pedagogical strategies in lesson planning: an assessment of senior high schools accounting teachers in Ghana. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(3), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i3.45

Devi, K. S. (2019). Constructivist approach to learning based on the concepts of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky an analytical overview. Journal of Indian Education, 44(4), 5-19. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ncert.gov.in/index.php/jie/article/view/2553

Dzidzinyo, A. F. (2020). Exploration of senior high school biology students’ conceptual understanding of genetics. [PhD. Thesis, University of Cape Coast]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7190

Ekong, N. J., Akpan, G. A., Anongo, M. C., & Okrikata, E. (2015). Influence of selected variables on students’ academic performance in genetics and their implications for effective application of STEM Education. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 6(4), 331–337. https://www.scholarlinkinstitute.org/jeteraps/articles/Influence%20of%20Selected%20Variables%20NEW.pdf

Emaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or student-centered learning approach to promote learning. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 10(2), 59–70. http://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v10i2.2161

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2012). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143

Eshun, E., & Amoah, C. A. (2018). Assessing the reasoning skills of biology students in selected senior high schools in the central region of Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i4.el12

Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6

Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8

Golder, J. (2018). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 678–686. Retrieved from https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1903214.pdf

Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Identification of misconceptions and causes of student misconceptions on genetics concept with CRI method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012053

Hadiprayitno, G., Muhlis, & Kusmiyati. (2019). Problems in learning biology for senior high schools in Lombok Island. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012054

Lei, G. (2024). Influence of ASSURE model in enhancing educational technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3297–3313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172047

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3900052/

McKimm, J., & Swanwick, T. (2018). Educational leadership and management. In T. Swanwick, K. Forrest, & B. C. O’Brien (Eds.), Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory, and practice (pp. 549-568). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373780.ch37

Ministry of Education, G. (2010). Teaching syllabus for biology (senior high school).

Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2021). Teacher-centered versus student-centered teaching. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v4i1.156

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin.

Sarkodie, N. A. (2023). Do Teaching Models Affect Students’ Academic Performance? Journal of Engineering Applied Science and Humanities, 8(1), 102-113. https://scholarindexing.com/uploads/files/i4xzpyqabd1gn_e.pdf

Thomas, M. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs about classroom teaching – teachers’ knowledge and teaching approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.805

Torre, N. O., Vidal, O. F., & Ferran, A. P. (2021). Constructivist learning models in training programs. Omnia Publisher SL. https://doi.org/10.3926/oms.407

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

WAEC. (2017). Chief Examiners’ Reports: Science Subjects.

WAEC. (2018). Chief Examiners’ Reports: Science Subjects.

WAEC. (2019). Chief Examiners’ Report: Science Subjects.

Wrigley-Asante, C., Ackah, C. G., & Frimpong, L. K. (2023). Gender differences in academic performance of students studying Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the University of Ghana. SN Social Sciences, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00608-8

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Kasim, S., Agyei, C. A., & Maxwell, G. (2026). Instructional Design and Students’ Performance: The Role of the ASSURE Model in Teaching Genetics. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 3(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i2.140

Similar Articles

31-40 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.