Engagement and Secondary English Achievement: A Multi-Method Study of Climate, Family, and Psychological Capital

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i4.265

Keywords:

Commonality Analysis, Dominance Analysis, English Achievement, Shared Variance, Student Engagement, Suppression Diagnostics

Abstract

English-language proficiency gates access to tertiary education, employment, and competitive examinations in India, yet large learning-outcome surveys continue to document wide variation in secondary-stage English achievement. Classroom climate, parental involvement, psychological capital, and student engagement are the constructs most often linked to such achievement, but their joint contribution is usually summarised through a single average-effect model. This study examines how these four constructs relate to English achievement among Indian secondary students, using a variance-decomposition framework that distinguishes unique from shared explanatory variance. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 1,605 students in classes XI and XII (52.6% female; mean age 16.74 years) drawn from 107 secondary schools in West Bengal, India. Six complementary variance-partitioning analyses were applied to the zero-order correlation matrix: a saturated structural equation model, dominance analysis, commonality analysis, suppression and redundancy diagnostics, mutual-information dependence decomposition, and community-aware bridge centrality. The full model accounted for 31.4% of the variance in English achievement. Engagement showed the strongest direct standardised association (β = .327) and the largest unique variance contribution (43.6% of explained variance). Commonality analysis indicated that only 29.7% of explained variance was uniquely attributable to single predictors, with 70.3% shared among combinations of predictors. Suppression diagnostics revealed no suppression but substantial redundancy for three of four predictors, and engagement showed the highest cross-domain bridge strength (BS = .722). Engagement appears as the most central associational construct in the system, but the four predictors operate substantially as overlapping representations of related learner and contextual processes rather than as independent unique contributors. Convergent associational evidence across multiple methods is stronger than evidence from any single method, but the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; longitudinal and experimental work is needed before intervention claims can be made.

Author Biographies

  • Palash Majumder, School of Education, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur, India

    Palash Majumder  is a research scholar in the field of Education. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. at the School of Education, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India. He holds a Master's degree in Education and English. With teaching experience in secondary education, he has developed a strong academic interest in English as a Second Language (ESL) pedagogy, classroom climate, student engagement, and educational psychology. He has authored and presented multiple research papers focusing on the relationship between classroom environment, parental involvement, and student achievement, with a special emphasis on psychological capital. His research interests include ESL achievement, student engagement, classroom climate, parental involvement, educational technology, and sustainable learning practices. He can be contacted at email: rajumajumder56@gmail.com

  • Nimisha Beri, Department of Teacher Education, National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India

    Dr. Nimisha Beri  is an Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education, National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India. She holds a Ph.D. in Education and has over two decades of experience in teacher education, research, and academic leadership. Her areas of specialization include educational psychology, inclusive education, curriculum development, and teacher training. She has guided numerous research scholars at the postgraduate and doctoral levels and has published extensively in national and international journals. Dr. Beri has also contributed to curriculum reforms, policy discussions, and educational development projects. Her research interests include teacher professional development, classroom climate, inclusive practices, educational leadership, and the integration of technology in education. She can be contacted at email: berinimi@gmail.com

  • Parimal Sarkar, School of Education, Netaji Subhas Open University, Kolkata, India

    Parimal Sarkar is an Assistant Professor at the School of Education, Netaji Subhas Open University. His academic and research interests primarily focus on Environmental Studies and Education, Education and Society, Education of Backward Classes, Educational Environment, and other contemporary issues related to inclusive and socially responsive education. His scholarly work reflects a sustained engagement with the social, cultural, and environmental dimensions of education, particularly in relation to equity, access, and educational development among marginalized communities. He is also interested in understanding the relationship between educational environments and learner development within diverse socio-educational contexts. He can be contacted at his email: p.sarkar@wbnsou.ac.in

References

Anthonyraj, S. V., & Sasikala, S. (2021). Development and validation of perceived parental involvement questionnaire (pp. 90–94). Indian Association of Health, Research and Welfare (IAHRW). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349643959_Development_and_Validation_of_Perceived_Parental_Involvement_Questionnaire

Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129

Banerji, R., & Wadhwa, W. (2024). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2023: Beyond basics. Pratham. https://asercentre.org/aser-2023/

Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000201

Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_15

Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608

Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542

Burger, J., Isvoranu, A.-M., Lunansky, G., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Epskamp, S., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Fried, E. I., Borsboom, D., & Blanken, T. F. (2023). Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471

Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2938–2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8

Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002

Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108

Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400105

Daily, S. M., Mann, M. J., Lilly, C. L., Dyer, A. M., Smith, M. L., & Kristjansson, A. L. (2020). School climate as an intervention to reduce academic failure and educate the whole child: A longitudinal study. Journal of School Health, 90(3), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12863

Datu, J. A. D., & King, R. B. (2018). Subjective well-being is reciprocally associated with academic engagement: A two-wave longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.007

Datu, J. A. D., King, R. B., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2018). Psychological capital bolsters motivation, engagement, and achievement: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257056

Dong, N., & Maynard, R. (2013). PowerUp!: A tool for calculating minimum detectable effect sizes and minimum required sample sizes for experimental and quasi-experimental design studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(1), 24–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.673143

Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 1–11). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00001-2

Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707299706

Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744021

Ince, R. A. A. (2017). Measuring multivariate redundant information with pointwise common change in surprisal. Entropy, 19(7), Article 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19070318

Jeynes, W. H. (2017). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 49(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516630596

Jones, P. J., Ma, R., & McNally, R. J. (2021). Bridge centrality: A network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56(2), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898

Kim, S. (2022). Fifty years of parental involvement and achievement research: A second-order meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, Article 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, L. R., & Henson, R. K. (2012). Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00044

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.

MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542

Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., & Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: Multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02069

Muthee, J. M. (2011). The classroom climate inventory: Development and validation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kenyatta University.

National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2023). National Achievement Survey 2021: National report. Ministry of Education, Government of India.

Nimon, K., & Reio, T. G., Jr. (2011). Regression commonality analysis: A technique for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311411077

Nimon, K., Henson, R. K., & Gates, M. S. (2010). Revisiting interpretation of canonical correlation analysis: A tutorial and demonstration of canonical commonality analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 702–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2010.498293

Nimon, K., Lewis, M., Kane, R., & Haynes, R. M. (2008). An R package to compute commonality coefficients in the multiple regression case: An introduction to the package and a practical example. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.457

Olivier, E., Galand, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Hospel, V. (2021). Need-supportive teaching and student engagement in the classroom: Comparing the additive, synergistic, and global contributions. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101389

Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7

Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., Suessenbach, F., Frenzel, A. C., & Goetz, T. (2023). School grades and students’ emotions: Longitudinal models of within-person reciprocal effects. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101626

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015258

Rani, R., & Chaudhary, M. (2018). Psychological Capital Assessment Scale (PCAS). National Psychological Corporation: Agra.

Ray-Mukherjee, J., Nimon, K., Mukherjee, S., Morris, D. W., Slotow, R., & Hamer, M. (2014). Using commonality analysis in multiple regressions: A tool to decompose regression effects in the face of multicollinearity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(4), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12166

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Jingle-jangle revisited: History and further evolution of the student engagement construct. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_1

Salmela-Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upadyaya, K. (2021). Student engagement in adolescence: A scoping review of longitudinal studies 2010–2020. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(2), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12619

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410

Sharma, H., & Chowdhry, M. (2022). Student Engagement Scale (National Psychological Corporation, Agra), 2022.

Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603

Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8

Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., & Western, M. (2020). Student engagement as a mediator of the effects of socio-economic status on academic performance among secondary school students in Australia. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3599

Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1

Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Palash Majumder, Nimisha Beri, Parimal Sarkar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Majumder, P., Beri, N., & Sarkar, P. (2026). Engagement and Secondary English Achievement: A Multi-Method Study of Climate, Family, and Psychological Capital. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i4.265

Similar Articles

81-90 of 107

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.