Mayer’s Model of Solving Routine and Non-Routine Problems in Linear Word Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i2.62Keywords:
Linear Word Problems, Mayer’s Model, Non-RoutineAbstract
The Mayer model posits that students learn better from words and pictures than from words alone [HPX1.1], since dual representation of knowledge helps learners to construct verbal and pictorial mental models together and build connections between them. This study adopted Mayer’s (1985) model, consisting of problem translation, problem integration, solution planning, and solution execution, to examine problem-solving tasks. The objectives of the study were to translate, integrate, plan, and execute the four phases of linear word problems [HPX2.1]. The methods deployed a convergent parallel design to collect quantitative and qualitative data to compare and interpret the findings. The population was 638 students, comprising 400 and 238 from schools A’ and B’, and the sample was 350 students, comprising 200 and 150, respectively. And the ages ranged from 15 to 19 years [HPX3.1]. The data were collected through questionnaires and interview guides to complement and enhance validity and reliability. The data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and documents. The respondents had ethical consent, anonymity, permission, and voluntary participation. The key findings showed that the translation phase showed a significant negative statement, but a high presence of undecided responses across both non-routine linear word problems. Integration showed higher performance of students at higher percentiles, even though there were pronounced disparities between routine and non-routine linear problems, with routine problems showcasing higher average scores and less variability compared to non-routine problems. The planning phase showed differences in solving non-routine linear problems in expansion errors, clearing fractions, opening brackets, and grouping like terms. The execution phase consistently showed high percentages of errors in variable definitions and distribution. To minimize errors, we concluded that targeted interventions should strengthen and promote multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and interdisciplinary approaches to allow learners to translate, integrate, plan, and execute the four phases of linear word problems.
References
Aforklenu, D. K., & Bukari, H. I. (2023). Algebra word problem difficulties: A case study in Tema Education Metropolis in Ghana. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(1), em036. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13133
Aja, L., Abonyi, O. S., Green, B., Muhammad, T., Elom, I. J., Lubega, M., & Otitoju, A. M. (2025). Mediating role of learning skills in the relationship between student achievements in basic science and teaching skills in the twenty-first century in government-aided secondary schools. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i2.39
Ali, C. A. (2023). Using indigenous artifacts to support the conceptual field approach of learning special trigonometric angles. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13698
Arifin, Z., & Jupri, A. (2025). Unveiling students’ cognitive patterns in word problem solving: The case of single-variable linear equations. Jurnal Elemen, 11(4), 879-897. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i4.30786
Baidoo, J., & Ali, C. A. (2024). Students’ mathematics and real-life contexts in solving algebraic word problems. Al-Tabar Journal of Pendikan Mathematica-Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 483-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i2.19272
Bukari, H. I. (2019). Using problem-based learning to enhance junior high school students’ understanding and attitude towards linear equations word problems. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(3), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/10-3-14
Capone, R., Filiberti, F. & Lemmo, A. (2021). Analyzing difficulties in arithmetic word problem solving: an epistemological case study in primary school. Education Sciences, 11, 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100596
Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A convergent parallel mixed-methods study of controversial issues in social studies classes: A clash of ideologies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 119–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0298
Emanuel, E. P. L., Kirana, A., & Chamidah, A. (2021). Enhancing students’ ability to solve word problems in Mathematics. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1832(1), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012056
Gavaz, H. O., Yazgan, Y., & Arslan, Y. (2021). Non-routine problem solving and strategy flexibility: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370581
Hunt, T. E., & Maloney, E. A. (2022). Appraisals of previous math experiences play an important role in math anxiety. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1515(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14805
Kablan, Z., & Uğur, S. S. (2020). The relationship between routine and non-routine problem solving and learning styles. Educational Studies, 47(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1701993
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Keleş, T., & Yazgan, Y. (2022). Indicators of gifted students’ strategic flexibility in non-routine problem-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(10), 2797–2818. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2105760
Krawitz, J., Chang, Y. P., Yang, K. L., & Schukajlow, S. (2021). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10058-9
Leow, S.H., & Kaur, B. (2024). A study of grade two students solving a non-routine problem with access to manipulatives. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22, 1457–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10443-9
Lillis, M. (2024). From STEM to STE(A)M: STEM education through artistic pathways. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 3(2), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v3i2.19
Madzorera, A., & Essien, A. (2018). Understanding how multilingual students translate word problems to linear algebraic representations: an error analysis. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 13(3), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v13i03/17-32
Mayer, R.E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: an information processing approach (pp. 127‐150). Freeman.
Moleko, M. M., & Mosimege, M. D. (2020). Teachers’ and learners’ experiences for guiding effective teaching and learning of mathematics word problems. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1375-1394. https://www.iier.org.au/iier30/moleko.pdf
Nggaba, M. E. (2019). Analysis of students’ critical thinking ability in solving trigonometric problems. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE) (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032023
Ni, Y., & Lu, J. (2020). Research on junior high school English reading class based on the principle of timing and Thorndike’s three laws of learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(6), 962. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1106.13
Ofem, U. J., Nworgwugwu, E. C., Ovat, S. V., Anake, P. M., Anyin, N. N., Udeh, M. I., & Undie, R. A. (2024). Predicting affective and cognitive learning outcomes: A quantitative analysis using climate change vectors. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/14405
Pascual, L. E., & San Pedro, A. B. (2018). Post-secondary students’ level of proficiency in solving real-world problems in mathematics. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6(1), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.61019
Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K. et al. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Benz, S. A. (2020). Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58(100759), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100759
Qetrani, S., Ouailal, S., & Achtaich, N. (2021). Enhancing students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge using a new teaching approach of linear equations based on the equivalence concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 17(7), em1978. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10938
Rembert, D. M., Mack, N. A., & Gilbert, J. E. (2019). Exploring the needs and interests of fifth graders for personalized math word problem generation. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 592–597). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3325309
Rizos, I., & Gkrekas, N. (2024). Pattern recognition among primary school students: The relationship with mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(2), ep24010. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14689
Saadati, F., & Celis, S. (2023). Student motivation in learning mathematics in technical and vocational higher education: development of an instrument. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology . 11(1), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2194
Santos-Trigo, M. Problem-solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM Mathematics Education 56, 211–222 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8
Taley, B. I. & Ndamenenu, D. K. (2022). The phobia and contentment for mathematics. what context factors can do? Open Access Library Journal, 9, 1-21, e8636. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108636
Taley, B. I. (2022). Teacher and student views of mathematics word problem-solving task at senior high school level. FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Tay, Y. K., & Toh, T. L. (2023). A model for scaffolding mathematical problem-solving: From theory to practice. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23019. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13308
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020- 01130-4
Voskoglou, M. (2021). Problem solving and mathematical modelling. American Journal of Educational Research, 9, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-2-6
Wakhata, R., Balimuttajjo, S., & Mutarutinya, V. (2024). Relationship between students’ attitude towards, and performance in mathematics word problems. PloS One, 19(2), e0278593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.027859
West African Examination Council. (2022). Chief examiner’s report for core mathematics. WASSCE. https://www.waeconline.org.ng/e-learning/Mathematics/maths235jw.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azobit Charles Awindago, Clement Ayarebilla Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
