STEM Teachers’ Use of E-Learning Resources in Scripted Lessons: Endeavours Toward Teacher Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i2.40Keywords:
E-Learning Resources, Essential Technology Component, Scripted Lesson, Teaching Competency, Professional DevelopmentAbstract
Globally, teacher professional development is increasingly gaining recognition as an intervention that ensures practitioners are equipped with the teaching competencies needed to keep abreast of a rapidly evolving educational environment. Developing professional competencies is critical to a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teacher’s growth. Empirical studies indicate that regular STEM teacher professional development (STEM-TPD) is necessary to develop these competencies. Drawing on the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, this mixed-methods study examines how beneficiaries of a Continuous Professional Development Certificate in Innovative Teaching Mathematics and Science (CPD ITMS) apply acquired skills to integrate e-learning resources into the teaching rehearsals of STEM subjects. Four purposively selected teachers take turns teaching scripted Mathematics, Biology, and Chemistry lessons. The teachers and one hundred and seventy (170) learners are participants in the study. Data is generated from Lesson Observations and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) sessions. Findings reveal that the teachers’ abilities to integrate e-learning resources in teaching and learning were at different levels. The majority of them applied integration strategies that were teacher-centered rather than learner-centered. Other findings show that teachers’ inability to navigate within the Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) aspects of the TPACK caused most of their challenges. Overall, lesson scripting provided for consistent teacher rehearsals and learners’ engagement that potentially heightened opportunities for teacher professional growth and sustained STEM-learning motivation for students. The study recommends sandwiched scripting that alternates with non-scripted, individually designed lessons to wean STEM teachers into sustainable capacity development.
Metrics
References
Abina, A., Temeljotov Salaj, A., Cestnik, B., Karalič, A., Ogrinc, M., Kovačič Lukman, R., & Zidanšek, A. (2024). Challenging 21st-Century Competencies for STEM Students: Companies’ Vision in Slovenia and Norway in the Light of Global Initiatives for Competencies Development. Sustainability, 16(3), 1295.
Anbar, N., & El Naggar, M. (2024). E-training environment for developing Capstone teaching skills for STEM teachers in Egypt. ESI Preprints, 20(16), 129-129.
Avery, Z. K., & Reeve, E. M. (2013). Developing effective STEM professional development programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55-69.
Barakabitze, A. A., William-Andey Lazaro, A., Ainea, N., Mkwizu, M. H., Maziku, H., Matofali, A. X., ... & Sanga, C. 2019. Transforming African education systems in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) using ICTs: Challenges and opportunities. Education Research International, 1-29.
Britten, J. S., & Cassady, J. C. (2012). The Technology Integration Assessment Instrument: Understanding planned use of technology by classroom teachers. In C. D. Maddux & D. L. 49-61). Routledge
Burke, B. M. (2013). Experiential professional development: A model for meaningful and long-lasting change in classrooms. Journal of Experiential Education, 36(3), 247-263.
Carl, N. M. (2014). Reacting to the script: Teach for America teachers’ experiences with scripted curricula. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(2), 29-50.
Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5-13.
Chaturvedi, S. R. B. H., & Shweta, R. C. (2015). Evaluation of inter-rater agreement and inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview of concepts and methods. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 41(3), 20-27.
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation, Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
Dede, C., Eisenkraft, A., Frumin, K., & Hartley, A. (Eds.). (2016). Teacher learning in the digital age: Online professional development in STEM education. Harvard Education Press.
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 182-188.
Faikhamta, C., Ketsing, J., Tanak, A., & Chamrat, S. (2018). Science teacher education in Thailand: a challenging journey. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1-18.
Fang, Z., Fu, D., & Lamme, L. L. (2004). From scripted instruction to teacher empowerment: Supporting literacy teachers to make pedagogical transitions. Literacy, 38(1), 58-64.
Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259.
Huang, B., Jong, M. S. Y., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 189, 104577.
Irwanto, I., Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, W., Ramadhan, M. F., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(5), 19-32.
Jimenez, B. A., Lo, Y. Y., & Saunders, A. F. (2014). The additive effects of scripted lessons plus guided notes on science quiz scores of students with intellectual disability and autism. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 231-244.
Kent, D. (2019). Plickers and the pedagogical practicality of fast formative assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 90-104.
Khokhotva, O., & Elexpuru Albizuri, I. (2020). Student voice in Lesson Study as a space for EFL teachers’ learning: A case study in Kazakhstan. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(2), 153-166.
López, J. M. C., & Caceres, M. J. M. 2010. Virtual games in social science education. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1336-1345.
Masters, H. (2020). Using teaching rehearsals to prepare preservice teachers for explanation- driven science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 414-434.
McNulty, A., & Lazarevic, B. 2012. Best practices in using video technology to promote second language acquisition. Teaching English with technology, 12(3), 49-61.
Milosovic, S. (2007). Building a case against scripted reading programs: A look at the NCLB’s Reading First initiative’s impact on curriculum choice. The Education Digest 73: 27-30.
MINEDUC (2022). Rwanda quality basic education for human capital development project: Updated stakeholder engagement plan (SEP) for the second additional financing. Government of Rwanda.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108 (6), 1017-1054.
Mwandia, M., & Mwanza, D. S. (2022). Merits and Demerits of Pre-Scripted Literacy Lessons in Zambia. Multidisciplinary Journal of Language and Social Sciences Education, 5(2), 11-24.
Nguyen, V. B. H., Vu, T. M. H., Hoang, T. K. H., & Nguyen, T. M. N. (2020). Vietnamese education system and teacher training: Focusing on science education. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(1), 179-2
Nkundabakura, P., Nsengimana, T., Uwamariya, E., Nyirahabimana, P., Nkurunziza, J. B., Batamuliza, J., ... & Nsabayezu, E. (2024). Effectiveness of continuous professional development training on lower secondary school mathematics and science teachers’ content knowledge in Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 7(2), 128-144.06.
Niyibizi, O., Uwitatse, M. C., & Mutarutinya, V. (2024). Teachers' Perceptions of Continuous Professional Development in Innovative Mathematics and Science Teaching. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 5(2), 95-107.
Nsengimana, T., Nsengimana, V., Nkundabakura, P., Iyamuremye, A., Mutarutinya, V., Mugabo, L. R., & Nsabayezu, E. (2024). Exploring the skills acquired by mathematics and science teachers through the development of scripted lessons for continuous professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18.
Postholm, M. B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1522781. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781
Reeves, J. (2010). Teacher learning by script. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 241-258.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Song, M. (2017). Teaching integrated STEM in Korea: Structure of teacher competence. LUMAT-B: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 2(4), 61-72.
Song, M. (2020). Integrated STEM teaching competencies and performances as perceived by secondary teachers in South Korea. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 22(2), 131-146.
Stefanova, E., Nikolova, N., Zafirova-Malcheva, T., Mihnev, P., Georgiev, A., & Antonova, A. (2019). Participatory Model for Identifying and Measuring Teacher Competences for Open and Inquiry- Based Learning in STEM–field Experience. EPiC Series in Education Science, 2, 28-39.
Suryadi, A., Purwaningsih, E., Yuliati, L., & Koes-Handayanto, S. (2023). STEM Teacher Professional Development in Pre-Service Teacher Education: A Literature Review. Waikato Journal of Education, 28(1), 7-26.
Thuy, N. T. T., Van Bien, N., & Quy, D. X. (2020). Fostering teachers’ competence in integrated STEM education. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(2), 166-179.
University of Rwanda (2023). Continuous Professional Development Certificate Innovative Teaching Mathematics and Science: Innovative teaching methods for mathematics and science in “O” level. Rwanda Basic Education Board (REB).
Ward, P., & Ayvazo, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptions and findings in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 194-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0037
Warin, B., Talbi, O., Kolski, C., & Hoogstoel, F. (2015). Multi-role project (MRP): A new project-based learning method for STEM. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(2), 137-146.
Wyatt, T. R. (2014). Teaching across the lines: Adapting scripted programmes with culturally relevant/responsive teaching. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(3), 447-469.
Yip, W. Y. V. (2020). Developing Undergraduate Student Teachers’ Competence in Integrative STEM Teaching. Frontiers in Education, 5(44), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00044
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171-203.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christopher Mutseekwa, Cefas Nyasha Zimuto, Kevin Manunure, Jones Maeresera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
