An Observational Study of Teaching Methods in Secondary School Science Classrooms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v3i2.49

Keywords:

Science Instruction, Teaching Method, Teacher-Centred Learning, Student-Centred Learning, Science Classrooms

Abstract

Science education plays a critical role in developing learners’ problem-solving, inquiry, and critical thinking skills. However, despite calls for student-centered and technology-enhanced methods, teacher-centered methods, particularly lecture-based instruction, still dominate the science classroom. While such methods ensure curriculum coverage, they often limit opportunities for active engagement, collaboration, and deeper conceptual understanding. This study, therefore, investigates the teaching methods most commonly used in secondary school science classrooms, examining the prevalence of teacher-centered, student-centered, and technology-enhanced instructional strategies. The instrument used was the Science Classroom Instruction Observation Sheet (SCIOS). Data were collected from 80 observed lessons in public and private schools. The findings revealed that lecture-based instruction dominates science classrooms, while student-centered methods such as small-group discussions, desk work, and student presentations remain infrequent, rarely exceeding five observations per interval. Additionally, technology-enhanced strategies, including multimedia and digital simulations, were among the least observed, appearing in fewer than three intervals on average. The heavy reliance on teacher-centered instruction, while effective for content delivery, raises concerns about its impact on student engagement and inquiry-based learning. These findings emphasize the need for a more balanced instructional approach that integrates interactive, student-driven strategies to enhance science education.

Author Biography

  • Adeniyi Michael Adeduyigbe, Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Adeduyigbe Adeniyi Michael is a highly skilled and dedicated physics educator with a B.Sc. Ed in Physics Education from Adeyemi College of Education (affiliated with Obafemi Awolowo University) and an M.Ed in Science Education (Physics) from the University of Ibadan, where he is currently pursuing a PhD. Adeniyi has extensive experience in teaching and curriculum development, having held roles as a subject teacher and class teacher at respected institutions. He has demonstrated leadership as the Head of the Department of Science. He has actively contributed to the design and delivery of classroom instruction and offered guidance during practical classes. Adeniyi is deeply committed to enhancing student engagement and fostering academic excellence through innovative teaching methodologies. He is also a certified member of the Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN). He has presented research papers at prominent educational conferences and published papers in international journals focusing on science education,  student learning difficulties and misconceptions in physics.

References

Agwu, U. D., & Nmadu, J. (2023). Students’ interactive engagement, academic achievement and self concept in chemistry: An evaluation of cooperative learning pedagogy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 688-705. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00148A

Burchard, C., Nguru, F., & Pembe, F. K. (2025). Enhancing science literacy in secondary school physics: A systematic review of multimedia integration strategies and resources. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development Studies, 2(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.70232/jesds.v2i1.26

Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2020). Analysis of teaching techniques and scheme of work in teaching chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7833

Chang, C. Y. (2003). Teaching earth sciences: Should we implement teacher-directed or student-controlled CAI in the secondary classroom?. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145701

Chang, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). The interplay between different forms of CAI and students’ preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Science Education, 89(5), 707-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20072

Chasokela, D., & Hlongwane, J. (2025). Leveraging AI and ICT for greener education in the face of climate change in smart classrooms. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i1.24

Demirbilek, M. (2024). Barriers to technology integration. In V. Tünkler, & Ö. Akman (Eds.). Social Studies Teaching III: Integrating Technology into the Social Studies (pp. 51-69). ISTES Organization. https://www.istes.org/storage/01JFNCX4KKSFXP9JBGCW94R98Y.pdf

Duterte, J. P. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning environments: Improving engagement and learning. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 1305-131. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100111

Francom, G. M. (2020). Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055

Hora, M. T. (2015). Toward a descriptive science of teaching: How the TDOP illuminates the multidimensional nature of active learning in postsecondary classrooms. Science Education, 99(5), 783-818. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21175

Iyamuremye, F., & Ndagijimana, J. B. (2022). Challenges facing the use of multimedia in teaching and learning in secondary schools in Muhanga District, Rwanda. International Journal on Integrated Education, 5(9), 86-109. https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/3474

Kranzfelder, P., Bankers-Fulbright, J. L., García-Ojeda, M. E., Melloy, M., Mohammed, S., & Warfa, A. R. M. (2019). The Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments. PLOS One, 14(7), e0219019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219019

Lowther, D., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2006). The influence of technology on instructional practices. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 6(5), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v06i05/49383

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2022). Assessment of Rwandan physics students’ active learning environments: classroom observations. Physics Education, 57(4), 045027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac69a2

Ntawiha, P., Nasiforo, B. M., Buhigiro, L. J., & Barayagwiza, P. (2023). Enhancing quality of teaching and learning sciences through multimedia in selected secondary schools in Rwanda. The Cradle of Knowledge: African Journal of Educational and Social Science Research, 11(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajessr.v11i2.6

Schermer, M., & Fosker, T. (2020). Reconsidering methods for systematic classroom observation: The measurement and analysis of categorical time-series observations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(3), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1687667

Shaby, N., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Koch, N. P. (2024). Students’ interactions during laboratory group activity in a science museum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 703-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10404-8

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.

Wang, T. H., & Yang, K. T. (2016). Technology-enhanced science teaching and learning: Issues and trends. In M. H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 461-481). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_25

Woodrow, J. E., Mayer-Smith, J. A., & Pedretti, E. G. (2000). Assessing technology enhanced instruction: A case study in secondary science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.2190/AX3R-A8T1-H5A3-810H

Wu, H. K., & Huang, Y. L. (2007). Ninth‐grade student engagement in teacher‐centered and student‐centered technology‐enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20216

Yılmaz, Ö. (2023). The Role of Technology in Modern Science Education. In Ö. Baltacı (Ed.), Current research in education – VI (pp. 35-60). Özgür Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub383.c1704

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Ukoh, E. E., Adeduyigbe, A. M., & Olagunju, A. M. (2026). An Observational Study of Teaching Methods in Secondary School Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v3i2.49

Similar Articles

11-20 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.