The Use of STEM as a Tool for Teaching the Concept of Magnetism in Kindergarten

Authors

  • Vasiliki Samara Lab of Physics Education and Teaching, Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Greece
  • Konstantinos T. Kotsis Lab of Physics Education and Teaching, Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Greece https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-0134

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v2i1.1

Keywords:

Hands-on Activities, Kindergarten, Magnetism, STEM Education

Abstract

This study explores the integration of STEM education as a tool for teaching the concept of magnetism to kindergarten children. The research highlights the importance of engaging young learners through hands-on activities and creative storytelling, which allows them to express their understanding of magnetism based on their everyday experiences. The findings indicate that children initially possess misconceptions about magnets, such as believing that they attract all metals and that larger magnets are inherently stronger than smaller ones. Children are guided to correct these misconceptions and better understand magnetic properties through structured activities, such as drawing objects attracted and repelled by magnets. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT and ideogram.ai, facilitate collaborative storytelling, enabling children to create illustrated narratives about magnets and enhancing their engagement and creativity. The study also emphasizes the role of technology in supporting children’s learning processes, allowing them to visualize and present their findings innovatively, such as through videos and presentations. Moreover, the research identifies the need for further exploration of children’s interactions with magnets and the effectiveness of AI in teaching complex scientific concepts to preschoolers. The results suggest that active participation in STEM activities significantly boosts children’s confidence and interest in science, laying a foundation for future engagement in STEM fields. Overall, this paper contributes valuable insights into the pedagogical strategies that can enhance the teaching of magnetism in early childhood education, advocating for the continued integration of technology and creative methods in the learning process.

 

References

Bagno, E., & Eylon, B. S. (1997). From problem solving to a knowledge structure: An example from the domain of electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 726-736. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18642

Bailey, J., Francis, R.G., & Hill, D.M. (1987). Exploring ideas about magnets. Research in Science Education, 17, 113 – 116.

Bar, V., & Zinn, B. (1998). Similar frameworks of action-at-a-distance: Early scientists’ and pupils’ ideas. Science and Education, 7, 471-498. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008687204309

Bar, V., Zinn, B., & Rubin, E. (1997). Children’s ideas about action at a distance. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970191003

Barrow, H. (2000). Do elementary science methods textbooks facilitate the understanding of magnet concepts? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 199-205. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40186569

Beatoven. https://www.beatoven.ai/

BeeBot. https://grobotronics.com/bee-bot.html

Bonawitz E, Ullman TD, Bridgers S, Gopnik A, & Tenenbaum J B, (2019). Sticking to the Evidence? A Behavioral and Computational Case Study of Micro-Theory Change in the Domain of Magnetism. Cognitive Science, 43(8), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12765

Cambell, C. & Speldewinde, C. (2022). Early Childhood STEM Education for Sustainable Development. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjsusta/v_3a14_3ay_3a2022_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a3524-_3ad_3a773165.htm

Chat GPT. https://chat.openai.com/

Chatzidimitriou, P. (2015). Creating a technology-supported learning environment in the context of STEM Education by combining the collaborative Jigsaw strategy with Cognitive Learning methods for Primary School Education. https://dione.lib.unipi.gr/xmlui/handle/unipi/9266

Chesloff. D., (2013). STEM Education Must Start in Early Childhood. Education Week, 32, 32–27. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/03/06/23chesloff.h32.html

Christidou, V., Kazela, K., Kakana, D., & Valakosta, M. (2009). Teaching magnetic attraction to preschool children: A comparison of different approaches. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286096686_Teaching_magnetic_attraction_to_preschool_children_A_comparison_of_different_approaches

Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.658

Dimitriou, D. (2015). Cultivating science skills in Kindergarten by teaching magnets and their properties. http://dspace.uowm.gr/xmlui/handle/123456789/200

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005

Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1998). Building science concepts. A global summary of student ideas. Print.

Early Childhood Curriculum (2023). https://www.edweek.gr/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/fek-b-687-10-02-2023-prosholiki-ekpaidefsi.pdf

Fanchamps, N., Karampatzakis, D. et al. (2024). Teaching Educational Robotics blended and online with Augmented Reality a report (2024). eROBSON Consortium. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32285.52964

Finley, F.-N. (1986). Evaluating Instruction: The complementary use of clinical interviews. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 635–650. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/evaluating-instruction-complementary-use-of-clinical-interviews

Frey, K., (1991). Project method. Translation: Malliou St. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis.

Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Investigating perceptions of primary and preschool educators regarding incorporation of educational robotics into STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(1), ep24003. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14384

Gopnik A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416

Hickey, R., & Schibeci, R. A. (1999). The attraction of magnetism. Physics Education, 34(6), 383-388. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/6/408

Ideogram. https://ideogram.ai/t/explore

Kalogiannakis, M., Nirgianaki, G.-M., & Papadakis, S. (2018). Teaching magnetism to preschool children: The effectiveness of picture story reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 535–546 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0884-4

Katz, L. G. & Chard, S. C. (2004). The Project method: the development of critical thinking and creativity of preschool children. Atrapos.

Kermani, H., & Aldemir, J. (2015). Preparing children for success: integrating science, math, and technology in early childhood classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1504–1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1007371

Kidspiration. https://learningworksforkids.com/apps/kidspiration/

Koutsikouri, D., Austin, S. & Dainty, A. (2008). Critical success factors in collaborative multi‐disciplinary design projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(3), 198-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/17260530810918243

LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Student Interest in STEM Careers: The Roles of Motivation and Ability Beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092

Lemmer, M., Kriek, J and Erasmus, B (2020). Analysis of students’ conceptions of basic magnetism from a complex systems perspective. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 375–392 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9693-z

Mann, E. L., Mann, R. L., Strutz, M. L., Duncan, D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Integrating Engineering Into K-6 Curriculum. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11415007

McClure E, Guernsey L, Clements D, Bales S, Nichols J, Kendall-Taylor N, et al. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

Mödritscher, F. (2006). E – Learning Theories in Practice: A comparison of three methods. https://www.jucs.org/justl_0_0/elearning_theories_in_practice/justl_0_0_003_0018_moedritscher.pdf

Moomaw, S. & Davis, J. (2010). STEM Comes to Preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12-18.

Piaget, J., & Chollet, M. (1973). Le problème de l’attraction à propos des aimants. In J. Piaget (ed.), La formation de la notion de force (pp. 223-243). PUF, Paris.

Poimenidou, Μ., & Christidou, V. (2010). Communication practices and the construction of meaning: science activities in the kindergarten. Creative Education, 1(2), 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.12013

Raptis, A. & Raptis, A. (2004). Learning and Teaching in the Information Age – A Holistic Approach. Volume A. Self-published.

Ravanis, K. (1994). The discovery of elementary magnetic properties in Preschool age. Qualitative and quantitative research within a Piagetian framework. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2(2), 79–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13502939485207621

Rendon, J. D. L., Doloretos, N. L., Capilitan, L. B., Dumaan, D. L., Mamada, M. J. D., & Mercado, J. C. (2022). Alternative Teaching Methods in Electricity and Magnetism. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(8), 1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.08.23

Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023a). A teaching intervention for magnetism using STEM in kindergarten. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(2), ep2312. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13667

Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023b). Educational Robotics in Primary Education in Greece: Methodological Approaches and Attitudes of Teachers. A Bibliographic Review. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.629

Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., & Vergine C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838-3846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1122

Sharapan, H. (2012). From STEM to STEAM: How early childhood educators can apply Fred Rogers’ approach. Young Children, 67(1), 36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975479

Smolleck, L., & Hershberger, V. (2011). Playing with science: An investigation of young children’s science conceptions and misconceptions. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-32.

Story jumper. https://www.storyjumper.com/book/read/16476072/StoryJumper

Temertzidou, E., Papadopoulou, P., & Kariotoglou, P. (2014). A study of preschool children’s skills in classifying materials based on their magnetic properties (Greek). In Natural Sciences and Environment in Preschool Education Searches and Suggestions. Gutenberg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280801641_Melete_ton_dexioteton_paidion_proscholikes_elikias_sten_taxinomese_ylikon_me_base_tis_magnetikes_tous_idiotetes#fullTextFileContent

Van Hook, S., & Huziak-Clark, T. (2007). Tip-to tail: developing a conceptual model of magnetism with kindergartens using inquirybased instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 19(2), 45-58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43156161

Zakariah, N. D., Kamarrudin, H., Tompang, Ε, Mohtar, L. E. & Halim, L. (2016). STEM Teaching Strategies of Primary School Science Teachers: An Exploratory Study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311693544_STEM_Teaching_Strategies_of_Primary_School_Science_Teachers_An_Exploratory_Study

Downloads

Published

2025-01-02

How to Cite

Samara, V., & T. Kotsis, K. (2025). The Use of STEM as a Tool for Teaching the Concept of Magnetism in Kindergarten. Journal of Research in Environmental and Science Education, 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v2i1.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)