Transforming Science Education: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Strategies for Cultivating 21st-Century Skills in STEM Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v3i1.37Keywords:
Collaboration, Critical Thinking, Digital Literacy, Inquiry-Based Learning, STEM EducationAbstract
The accelerating demands of the 21st century require science education to evolve beyond traditional content delivery and to cultivate skills such as critical thinking, collaboration, digital literacy, and global awareness. This systematic review examines 20 empirical studies published between 2017 and 2025 to identify evidence-based instructional strategies, namely inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, and integrated STEM approaches and immersive technologies (virtual reality, augmented reality, and simulations) that support the development of these competencies. Studies were retrieved from ScienceDirect (Scopus) and Google Scholar, screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and synthesised through thematic analysis. Findings demonstrate that scaffolded inquiry and project-based frameworks consistently enhance critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration, particularly when complemented by structured reflection and visual-tool support. Immersive technologies amplify engagement and conceptual understanding, especially when metacognitive prompts accompany virtual or hands-on laboratory experiences. Integrated-STEM and EthnoVLab models further underscore the value of interdisciplinary, context-rich projects for motivation and higher-order skill acquisition. Equity-centred designs that incorporate assistive technologies and professional development for teachers are shown to be vital for inclusive implementation. Persistent barriers include limited access to technology, insufficient teacher training, and uneven policy support. The review highlights the need for longitudinal, mixed-method, and comparative investigations to assess the durability of 21st-century skill gains and to refine discipline-specific assessment tools. Implications extend to researchers, who should pursue innovative study designs; to policymakers, who must embed interdisciplinary, equity-focused standards and support structures; and to practitioners, who can pilot blended-STEM initiatives with peer-learning networks. Ultimately, this work offers actionable insights for bridging traditional pedagogy and contemporary educational demands, fostering sustainable reforms in science education.
References
Adeduyigbe, A. M., Adeduyigbe, A. E., & Tijani, B. E. (2024). Addressing students with hearing impairment’s current state and future needs: Reforming an inclusive science education. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(2), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijsie.v1i2.1448
Adeduyigbe, A. M., Ukoh, E. E., & Okeke, U. K. (2025). Influence of gender on secondary school physics students’ learning difficulties in electricity. Physics Education, 60(2), 025017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/adab5d
Aksela, M., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-based learning (PBL) in practice: Active teachers’ views of its’ advantages and challenges. Integrated Education for the Real World, 34, 9-16.
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Andersen, R., & Rustad, M. (2022). Using Minecraft as an educational tool for supporting collaboration as a 21st century skill. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100094.
Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The impact of the use of STEM education approach on the blended learning to improve student’s critical thinking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3B), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081503
Ardianti, S., Yahya, F., & Fitrianto, S. (2020). The Impact of Using the STEM Education Approach with Blended Learning to Increase Students’ Learning Interest. Indonesian Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://journal.publication-center.com/index.php/ijse/article/view/66.
Baz, K., Xu, D., Ali, H., Khan, U., Cheng, J., Abbas, K., & Ali, I. (2022). Nexus of minerals-technology complexity and fossil fuels with carbon dioxide emission: Emerging Asian economies based on product complexity index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133703
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, S. A. (2025). Relationship between creative thinking and outcomes in a digital STEM-based learning environment: A mixed methods case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101816.
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2017). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebothem, M. (2016). Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 40, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.010
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2023). CASP Systematic Review Checklist. Assessed on March 10, 2025, from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/systematic-review-checklist/.
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2016). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Halawa, S., Hsu, Y., Zhang, W., Kuo, Y., & Wu, J. (2020). Features and trends of teaching strategies for scientific practices from a review of 2008–2017 articles. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1752415.
Hassan, S. T., Wang, P., Khan, I., & Zhu, B. (2022). The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Research, 113, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.001
Hsu, Y., Lin, Y., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z.
Ibáñez, M., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Jumaat, N. F., Tasir, Z., Halim, N. D. A., & Ashari, Z. M. (2017). Project-based learning from constructivism point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904–7906. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9605
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & Cakir, H. (2022). Investigating the effects of different levels of guidance in inquiry-based hands-on and virtual science laboratories. International Journal of Science Education, 44(2), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2028926
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Significance of experiments in inquiry-based science teaching. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.815
Kumar, D., Haque, A., Mishra, K., Islam, F., Mishra, B. K., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Exploring the transformative role of artificial intelligence and metaverse in education: a comprehensive review. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 2, 55. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202355 (Review)
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Le, H. C., Nguyen, V. H., & Nguyen, T. L. (2023). Integrated STEM approaches and associated outcomes of K-12 student learning: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030297.
Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266
Manokore, K., & Sibanda, L. (2024). National STEM education framework: teachers’ perspectives on the 2015-2022 curriculum cycle. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.12
Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Mou, T. (2024). The practice of visual storytelling in STEM: Influence of creative thinking training on design students’ creative self-efficacy and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101459.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through STEM education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Nikkola, T., Kangas, J., & Reunamo, J. (2024). Children’s creative participation as a precursor of 21st century skills in Finnish early childhood education and care context. Learning and Individual Differences, 111, 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102437.
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2019). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st-century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844.
Ojo, O. T., & Tijani, B. E. (2025). Impact of open inquiry instructional strategy on secondary school chemistry students’ academic achievement: a student-centred approach leveraging digital resources. FUO-Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14872972.
Ojo, O.T. (2017). Effects of information technology-integrated teaching strategies on secondary school chemistry students’ learning outcomes in Lagos State, Nigeria (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Lagos, Nigeria).
Osiesi, M. P., & Blignaut, S. (2025). Impact of the teacher education curriculum on the development of 21st-century skills: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101317.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicologí a Educativa, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002
Persky, A. M., Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2018). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2), 7033. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7033
Rizki, I. A., Mirsa, F. R., Islamiyah, A. N., Saputri, A. D., Ramadani, R., & Habibbulloh, M. (2025). Ethnoscience-enhanced physics virtual simulation and augmented reality with inquiry learning: impact on students’ creativity and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101846.
Roslina, R., Samsudin, A., & Liliawati, W. (2022). Effectiveness of project based learning integrated STEM in physics education (STEM-PJBL): systematic literature review (SLR). Phenomenon Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2022.12.1.11722.
Saad, A. (2020). Students’ computational thinking skill through cooperative learning based on hands-on, inquiry-based, and student-centric learning approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080135
Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of project-based learning (PBL) and computational thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802.
Sari, U., Duygu, E., Şen, Ö. F., & Kirindi, T. (2020). The effects of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in simulation based inquiry learning environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.34
Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024). Application of experiential, inquiry-based, problem-based, and project-based learning in sustainable education. In Practice, progress, and proficiency in sustainability (pp. 109–128). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9859-0.ch006
Soulé, H., & Warrick, T. (2015). Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 9(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000017
Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1.
Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., & Bogner, F. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003.
Tijani, B. E. (2025). Impact of open inquiry instructional strategy on secondary school students’ academic achievement and conceptual knowledge in Chemistry across genders in Osun state, Nigeria. African Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v14i1.8256.
Tijani, B. E., & Adeduyigbe, A. M. (2025). Relevance of science education for self-reliance and economic growth in Nigeria: a systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00504-8.
Tytler, R. (2020). STEM Education for the Twenty-First Century. In Advances in STEM education (pp. 21–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
Tytler, R., Anderson, J., & Williams, G. (2023). Exploring a framework for integrated STEM: challenges and benefits for promoting engagement in learning mathematics. ZDM, 55(7), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01519-x.
Ünlü, Z. K., & Dökme, İ. (2022). A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2110–2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031.
Vistara, M. F., Rochmad, R., & Wijayanti, K. (2022). Systematic literature review: STEM approach through engineering design process with project based learning model to improve mathematical creative thinking skills. Mathematics Education Journal, 6(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i2.21150.
Wang, B., & Li, P. (2022). Digital creativity in STEM education: the impact of digital tools and pedagogical learning models on the students’ creative thinking skills development. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. Retrieved on December 21, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155839
Wilkie, K. J. (2024). Creative thinking for learning algebra: Year 10 students’ problem solving and problem posing with quadratic figural patterns. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101550.
Wolff, J. (2021). How is technology changing the world, and how should the world change technology? Global Perspectives, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.27353
Zhang, Y., Feijoo-Garcia, M. A., Gu, Y., Popescu, V., Benes, B., & Magana, A. J. (2024). Virtual and augmented reality in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: An umbrella review. Information, 15(9), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090515.
Zulyusri, Z., Elfira, I., Lufri, L., & Santosa, T. A. (2023). Literature study: Utilization of the PjBL model in science education to improve creativity and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2555
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bamidele Emmanuel Tijani, Adeniyi Michael Adeduyigbe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
