Intercultural Pragmatics and Language Pedagogy: Speech Act Strategies among Iranian Male and Female EFL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v3i4.266Keywords:
Promise, Suggestion, Persuasion, Speech Act, Language PedagogyAbstract
Speech acts are essential for effective communication, yet research has largely focused on cross-cultural variation, with limited attention to how non-native English speakers use them in multilingual, intercultural contexts. This study investigates the speech acts of suggestion, promise, and persuasion in English by analyzing the tactics utilized by a cohort of Iranian non-native speakers at Near East University in Cyprus. It specifically examines the production and perception of these behaviors, highlighting the potential impact of gender on communication methods. The study also aims to contribute to pedagogical understanding of pragmatic competence in English language education by examining how culturally shaped speech act strategies may influence communication in a multilingual learning environment. A cohort of Iranians completed a questionnaire and engaged in a structured follow-up interview. Responses were examined according to three categories for each speech act and were additionally classified based on the respondents’ gender, employing a coding scheme specifically designed for speech act analysis. The findings indicate that Iranian non-native speakers of English employ directive methods rather than indirect ones. Male participants had a greater propensity to employ directive methods during interactions with females, signifying a gender-based disparity in the execution of speech acts. This study elucidates distinctive patterns in speech acts and enhances comprehension of their production and perception in cross-cultural contexts, thereby augmenting knowledge in pragmatics and establishing a foundation for further research on culturally influenced communication strategies. These results highlight the pedagogical need to develop learners’ awareness of gender-sensitive and culturally appropriate communication strategies in English.
References
Abasi, A. R. (2012). The pedagogical value of intercultural rhetoric: A report from a Persian-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2012.05.010
Alavi, S. Z., & Zare, A. (2023). The comparison of speech act by Persian monolingual (Persian) and Turkish Persian bilingual students. Persian Language and Iranian Dialects, 7(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.22124/PLID.2023.23116.1616
Alfghe, A., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2021). Realisation of the speech act of request, suggestion and apology by Libyan EFL learners. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050378
Alshraah, S. M., Aly, E. M. S., & Nasim, S. M. (2024). Pragmatic realization in exploiting request expressions: a study of language proficiency and social context among Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2023.2013758.3233
Amakali, J. M. (2016). Persuasive speech acts in the Namibian National Assembly. http://hdl.handle.net/11070/1998
Apreutesei, A. A. (2023). Speech acts. A cross-cultural framework of analysis. Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, 844–855. https://www.asociatia-alpha.ro/Jrls/035-2023/Jrls-035-111.pdf
Black, M. (2014). What is a Speech Act? Philosophy in America, 221–239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315830636-11
Bogusławski, A. (1983). An analysis of promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90085-1
Coates, J. (2015). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645612
Cogo, A., & House, J. (2017). Intercultural Pragmatics. The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925-15
Davidson, M. J. (2016). Putting gender in its place: A case study on constructing speaker identities in a management meeting. Gender and Communication at Work, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315583839-14
Egner, I. (2006). Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising: Western and African practices. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2006.027
Esfahlan, F. K., & Boroumand, M. (2020). Gender and socioeconomic status: A pragmatic analysis of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL students in Persian and English requests. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1803–1820. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.851003
Eslami, Z. R., Mirzaei, A., & Farnia, M. (2023). Exploring (non-)ritual patterns of phatic interaction (small talks) at different phases of social encounters in Persian linguaculture. Acta Linguistica Academica, 70(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00692
Fish, S. E. (1976). How to do things with Austin and Searle: Speech act theory and literary criticism. MLN, 91(5), 983. https://doi.org/10.2307/2907112
Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-S
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2015). Power and politeness in the workplace : A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231
Kecskes, I. (2020). Interculturality and intercultural pragmatics. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 138–155). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036210-11
Keshtiari, N., & Kuhlmann, M. (2016). The effects of culture and gender on the recognition of emotional speech: evidence from Persian speakers living in a collectivist society. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(2), 71–86. https://www.ijscl.com/article_19785.html
Kurmanbekova, Z. R., Sarekenova, K. K., Oner, M., Malikov, K. T., & Shokabayeva, S. S. (2023). A linguistic analysis of social network communication. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2023.1972010.2824
Martínez Flor, A. (2005). A theoretical review of the speech act of suggesting: towards a taxonomy for its use in FLT. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 18, 167-187. https://doi.org/10.14198/RAEI.2005.18.08
Morley, D., Curran, J., & Walkerdine, V. (1996). Cultural studies and communication. Bloomsbury Academic. https://philpapers.org/rec/CURCSA-2
Östman, J.-O., & Verschueren, J. (2022). Handbook of pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–1904. https://doi.org/10.1075/HOP.M2
Pishghadam, R., & Khosropanah, F. (2011). Examining construct validation of the English language teachers competency test. International Education Studies, 4(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n3p194
Rachmawati, L. (2023). A sociolinguistic analysis of cross-gender interaction in the movie “10 Things I hate About You” based on Deborah Tannen’s Theory. Seminar Nasional Sosial, Sains, Pendidikan, Humaniora (Senassdra), 2(2), 761–767. https://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SENASSDRA/article/view/4494
Salzborn, S. (2016). John R. Searle: Speech acts. an essay in the philosophy of language, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1969, 203 S. (dt.: Sprechakte. Ein sprachphilosophischer Essay, Frankfurt 1983, 305 S.). Klassiker Der Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 268–271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13213-2_61
Shariati, M., & Chamani, F. (2010). Apology strategies in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRAGMA.2009.10.007
Shofwan, M. I., & Mujiyanto, J. (2018). Realization of Speech Acts of Suggestion by EFL Learners of Universitas Negeri Semarang. English Education Journal, 8(1), 87–95. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/22160
Smith, B. (2010). Towards a history of speech act theory. Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/vh.2.12smi
Streeck, J. (1980). Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle∗. Discourse Processes, 3(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544483
Suryandani, P. D., & Budasi, I. G. (2022). An analysis of directive speech acts produced by teachers in EFL classroom. Journal of English Language and Culture, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.30813/JELC.V12I1.2823
Wood-Downie, H., Wong, B., Kovshoff, H., Cortese, S., & Hadwin, J. A. (2021). Research Review: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex/gender differences in social interaction and communication in autistic and nonautistic children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(8), 922–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPP.13337
Yousefvand, Z. (2010). Study of compliment speech act realization patterns across gender in Persian. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 17(0), 91–112. Retrieved from https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/jslat/article/id/248/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lamya Hajihasankhansary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
