Equipping Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers for the Digital Classroom: Research on Tools, Pedagogies, and Instructional Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jcsml.v3i1.51Keywords:
Constructivist Pedagogy, Digital Tools, Mathematics Education, Pre-service Mathematics Teachers, Student-Centered Instruction, Technology IntegrationAbstract
This systematic literature review (SLR) synthesizes research published between 2014 and 2024 on preparing pre-service mathematics teachers (PSTs) for technology-enhanced classrooms. The study addresses the growing global expectation for teacher education programs to integrate digital tools and constructivist pedagogies while promoting equity and conceptual understanding in mathematics instruction. Despite these demands, PSTs often struggle to balance technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge, relying on traditional methods that limit authentic technology use. Guided by three research questions, the review examined: (a) how digital tools such as GeoGebra, 3D printing, and collaborative platforms influence PSTs’ mathematical understanding and real-world application; (b) how constructivist, technology-based strategies like flipped classrooms and peer learning affect engagement, confidence, and instructional planning; and (c) what factors shape PSTs’ ability to evaluate and integrate digital resources into student-centered, standards-aligned instruction. Using a rigorous SLR process across five major databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, JSTOR), 24 peer-reviewed studies were analyzed through Garrard’s Matrix Method and thematic coding. Findings reveal that digital tools enhance representational fluency, problem-solving, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), while constructivist approaches foster engagement, autonomy, and reflective practice. However, persistent challenges, such as inequitable access to technology, limited interdisciplinary training, and entrenched procedural teaching beliefs, constrain integration. Factors influencing adoption include pedagogical orientations, institutional support, and collaborative opportunities. The review concludes that the intentional, scaffolded integration of emerging technologies within constructivist frameworks strengthens PSTs’ readiness for 21st-century classrooms. However, the small sample of 24 articles and the exclusion of sources like gray literature limit the study’s generalizability. Nevertheless, the findings can guide teacher educators, curriculum designers, and education ministries in promoting equitable, technology-rich mathematics education through authentic digital inquiry and targeted professional development.
References
Akyuz, D. (2023). Exploring contextual factors for pre-service teachers teaching with technology through planning, teaching, and reflecting. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12624
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review 1-336 (2nd ed.). Sage.
Caniglia, J., & Meadows, G. (2018). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ use of web resources. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383185
Cheah, W.-L., et al. (2023). A systematic review of pre-service teachers’ integration of digital tools in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10471-x
Ching, Y.-H., Wang, S., & Long, M. (2025). Incorporating a 3D printing integrated STEM module into a college mathematics content course: Perceptions of pre-service elementary teachers. TechTrends, 69(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01016-2
Cho, Y., & Marshall Egan, T. (2009). Action learning research: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 8(4), 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309345656
Davis, J. D., & Witt, N. E. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ use of technology as reorganizer to promote different levels of conceptual understanding. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00110-5
Dilling, F., Witzke, I., Hörnberger, K., & Trgalová, J. (2024). Co-designing teaching with digital technologies: A case study on mixed pre-service and in service mathematics teacher design teams. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(4), 948–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01623-6
Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2024). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(5), 948–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2309273
Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital tools in mathematics teaching: Focus on multiple representations. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12055
Du, X., & Lyublinskaya, I. (2024). Pre service teachers’ TPACK learning trajectories in an online educational technology course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2160393
Garrard, J. (2004). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method. Jones & Bartlett.
Getenet, S. (2024). Pre-Service teachers and ChatGPT in multistrategy problem-solving: Implications for mathematics teaching in primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14141
Gonscherowski, P., & Rott, B. (2022). How do pre- and in-service mathematics teachers reason for or against the use of digital technology in teaching? Mathematics, 10(13), Article 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132345
Gurer, M. D., & Akkaya, R. (2022). The influence of pedagogical beliefs on technology acceptance: A structural equation modeling study of pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(1), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kartal, B., & Çınar, C. (2022). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ TPACK development when they are teaching polygons with GeoGebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2052197
Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4
Kreis, Y., Haas, B., Weinhandl, R., & Lavicza, Z. (2024). Transitioning from lectures to online flipped classrooms: Enhancing pre-service teacher education in Luxembourg. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2425895. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2425895
Li, L., Yu, F., & Zhang, E. (2024). A systematic review of learning task design for K-12 AI education: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100217
Marbán, J. M., & Mulenga, E. M. (2019). Pre-service primary teachers’ teaching styles and attitudes towards the use of technology in mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5649
Martínez-Zarzuelo, A., González, J., Cañadas, M. C., & López-Robles, M. A. (2025). An experience with pre-service teachers, using GeoGebra discovery automated reasoning tools for outdoor mathematics. Mathematics, 13(8), Article 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13081335
Milenković, T., & Vučićević, B. (2025). Advancing students’ achievements in multivariable calculus education through CSCL. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 10021–10044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12332-z
Nutov, L. (2021). Integrating visual arts into the mathematics curriculum: The case of pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, Article 103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103218
Parra-Urrea, O. M., & Pino-Fan, L. R. (2022). Proposal to systematize the reflection and assessment of the teacher’s practice on the teaching of functions. Mathematics, 10(5), Article 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050760
Polly, D., Martin, F., & Byker, E. J. (2022). Examining pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions of their readiness to use digital technologies for teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 40(1), 22–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2121107
Quarder, J., Greefrath, G., Gerber, S., & Siller, H.-S. (2025). Pedagogical content knowledge for simulations and mathematical modelling with digital tools: A quasi-experimental study with pre-service mathematics teachers. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57(1), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01673-4
Sailer, M., Stadler, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., Franke, U., Schöffmann, C., Paniotova, V., ... & Fischer, F. (2021). Technology-related teaching skills and attitudes: Validation of a scenario-based self-assessment instrument for teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106625
Şandır, H., & Aztekin, S. (2016). Pre-service math teachers’ opinions about dynamic geometry softwares and their expectations from them. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/342
Saralar-Aras, İ., & Türker-Biber, B. (2024). Enhancing technological pedagogical content knowledge of prospective teachers through mathematics lesson plan development. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14491–14512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12435-8
Segal, R., Oxman, V., & Stupel, M. (2021). Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11065
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Shambare, B., & Jita, T. (2025). From desire to understanding: Unveiling science teachers’ perspectives on virtual laboratories in rural classrooms. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2529079. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2529079
Slavíčková, M. (2021). Implementation of digital technologies into pre-service mathematics teacher preparation. Mathematics, 9(12), Article 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121319
Tchoshanov, M. A., Cruz, C. A., Huereca, K., & Shakirova, K. (2017). Curricular constraints in PST innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.015
Xie, M., & Luo, L. (2025). AI-TPACK development in Chinese MTES. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13533
Zengin, Y. (2019). Development of mathematical connection skills in a dynamic learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9767-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bernard Justus Wekullo, Romario Montano Ramos, Ana Huber Castillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
