AI Co-Creative Art Narrative and Emotional Mediation Research: A Computational Grounded Theory Analysis of “The Era of Prompts” Exhibition at Tainan Art Museum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jcsml.v3i1.45

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Art, Grounded Themes, Computational Writing, Emotional Mediation, Adaptive Development

Abstract

Against the backdrop of rapid development in generative artificial intelligence technology, the definition, process, and evaluation standards of artistic creation are undergoing a profound transformation. This study takes “The Era of Prompts—A Challenge Letter from AI to Humanity” exhibition at Tainan Art Museum as the research field, employing mixed research methods to explore the multiple impacts and educational implications triggered by AI intervention in artistic creation. The research integrates exhibition ethnography, procedural scaffolding experimental design, and computational grounded theory analysis, conducting a three-stage learning journey experiment with 206 university students in southern Taiwan. The primary objective was to understand how university students perceive and engage with AI in the context of art creation, and to identify the core themes that emerge from their learning experiences. The main findings reveal five grounded themes of AI art learning: computational writing practice, emotional expression mediation, imperfection value reconstruction, collaborative relationship dynamics, and literacy requirement identification. These five themes interact spirally to form the theoretical model of “Adaptive Development of Art Learning in the AI Era.” The research concludes that art education in the AI era needs to construct new pedagogical paradigms that embrace technological innovation while maintaining human subjectivity, criticality, and emotional depth in creation. This study provides important references for theoretical construction and educational practice of AI art, offering a nuanced understanding of the human-AI creative partnership. The findings suggest that rather than viewing AI as a mere tool, it should be approached as a collaborator, a mediator of emotional expression, and a catalyst for re-evaluating the very nature of creativity. This research contributes to the fields of art education, human-computer interaction, and digital humanities by providing an empirically grounded framework for designing and evaluating AI-integrated learning environments.

References

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-25. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/new-frameworks-for-studying-and-assessing-the-development-of-computational-thinking/

Charmaz, K. (2024). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/constructing-grounded-theory-3-255601

Chen, S. J., Shan, X., Liu, Z. M., & Chen, C. Q. (2024). Employing large language models to enhance K-12 students’ programming debugging skills, computational thinking, and self-efficacy. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 259-278. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48827986

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044

García Peñalvo, F. J., & Vázquez Ingelmo, A. (2023). What do we mean by GenAI? A systematic mapping of the evolution, trends, and techniques involved in generative AI. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(4), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2023.07.006

Jauhiainen, J. S., & Krohn, T. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and dynamic personalized learning pathways in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1347193. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

Lin, H. C. K., Tseng, C. H., & Chen, N. S. (2025). Enhancing programming education: The impact of AI-based pedagogical agents on student self-efficacy, engagement, and learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202504_28(2).TP02

Luo, H. L. (2025). The era of prompts─A Challenge Letter from AI to Humanity. Tainan Art Museum. https://www.tnam.museum/exhibition/detail/605

Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342-363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/video-games-and-learning-9780807751985

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

Tedre, M., & Vartiainen, H. (2023). Computational thinking and AI literacy: Emerging competencies for the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 1018-1036.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~15110-s13/Wing06-ct.pdf

Yin, S. X., Goh, D. H. L., Quek, C. L., & Liu, Z. (2025). Mapping the public understanding of computational thinking education: Insights from social Q&A platform discussions. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202504_28(2).RP02

Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2023). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025

Downloads

Published

16-02-2026

How to Cite

Lin, H.-C. K., Wang, T.-H., & Lu, R.-S. (2026). AI Co-Creative Art Narrative and Emotional Mediation Research: A Computational Grounded Theory Analysis of “The Era of Prompts” Exhibition at Tainan Art Museum. Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.70232/jcsml.v3i1.45

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.