Exploratory Path Analysis of Mathematics Ability Among At-Risk Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i3.81Keywords:
Appraisal, At-Risk Student, Confidence, Exploratory Path Analysis, Mathematics Ability, Reflective StrategyAbstract
Persistent mathematics underachievement among at-risk students remains a pressing educational concern because weak performance in mathematics can constrain later academic progression and learners’ ability to cope with more advanced school tasks. This study examined mathematics ability among at-risk students through an exploratory path analysis linking school-related, teacher-related, and student-related factors. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional, explanatory design, the study focused on students identified as at risk in mathematics through a TIMSS-like screening assessment. The respondents were 450 Grade 9 students from public and private junior high schools in Northwestern Mindanao, Philippines. There were 370 classified as at risk, and 368 cases were retained for the inferential analyses. Data were drawn from a mathematics ability test, a mathematics anxiety questionnaire, an attitude toward mathematics questionnaire, and a mathematics teaching strategy questionnaire. Analysis proceeded through descriptive statistics, regression-based screening, and exploratory path analysis using observed variables only. The final parsimonious model showed a good fit to the data. Appraisal and confidence emerged as the most immediate positive predictors of mathematics ability, while negative attitude showed a smaller negative role in the preliminary screening model. Teacher-related and school-related variables were linked to mathematics ability mainly through instructional and affective pathways. Reflective strategy showed positive direct and indirect associations through appraisal and confidence, whereas discussion showed negative indirect associations through the same mediators. The type of school also retained a small but significant direct contribution to mathematics ability, suggesting that broader school conditions remained relevant even after proximal affective and instructional factors were considered. The findings indicate that mathematics ability among at-risk students is best understood as a layered outcome shaped by school context, instructional processes, and students’ evaluative and competence-related responses to mathematics.
References
Aiken, L. R., Jr., & Dreger, R. M. (1961). The effect of attitudes on performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041309
Ayari, M. A., Sellami, A., Santhosh, M. E., Naji, K. K., Al-Ali, A., & Al-Hazbi, S. M. (2025). From problems to performance: A systematic review of problem-based learning in K-12 mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1731307. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1731307
Balagtas, M. U., Garcia, D. C. B., & Ngo, D. C. (2019). Looking through Philippine’s K to 12 curriculum in mathematics and science vis-a-vis TIMSS 2015 assessment framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108494
Banerjee, T., & Gautam, M. K. (2024). Inclusive mathematics classroom practices for children with diverse learning needs from the perspective of cognitive load theory. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(3), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16279
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147(2), 134–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000307
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Socioeconomic status moderates the relationship between growth mindset and learning in mathematics and science: Evidence from PISA 2018 Philippine data. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1832635
Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordel, M. O., Lapinid, M. R. C., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2022). Contrasting profiles of low-performing mathematics students in public and private schools in the Philippines: Insights from machine learning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030061
Breit, M., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2025). Mathematics achievement and learner characteristics: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102621
Capinding, A. T. (2022). Impact of modular distance learning on high school students mathematics motivation, interest/attitude, anxiety and achievement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.917
Capuno, R., Necesario, R., Etcuban, J. O., Espina, R., Padillo, G., & Manguilimotan, R. (2019). Attitudes, study habits, and academic performance of junior high school students in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5768
Caviola, S., Primi, C., Chiesi, F., & Mammarella, I. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in Italian primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.006
Cheung, S. K., Dulay, K. M., Yang, X., Mohseni, F., & McBride, C. (2021). Home literacy and numeracy environments in Asia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 578764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578764
Cheung, S. K., Yang, X., Dulay, K. M., & McBride, C. (2018). Family and individual variables associated with young Filipino children’s numeracy interest and competence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12222
Christopher, E., & William, F. (2026). Handling language difficulties in mathematical word problems using innovative language-supportive pedagogy. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i1.33
Deaño, M., Alfonso, S., Diniz, A. M., Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., & Das, J. P. (2023). Math modules training improves math achievement and associated cognitive processing. Psychology, 14(6), 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.146057
DepEd. (2019). PISA 2018: National report of the Philippines. National Report of the Philippines, 1–44. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf
Devries, J. M., Szardenings, C., Doebler, P., & Gebhardt, M. (2021). Subject-specific self-concept and global self-esteem mediate risk factors for lower competency in mathematics and reading. Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10010011
Dewanti, S., Ayriza, Y., & Setiawati, F. (2020). The application of item response theory for development of a students’ attitude scale toward mathematics. The New Educational Review, 60(2), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.20.60.2.09
Doepken, D., Lawsky, E., & Padwa, L. (1993). Modified Fennema-Sherman attitude scales. Woodrow Wilson Gender Equity in Mathematics and Science Congress. https://stelar.edc.org/instruments/modified-fennema-sherman-mathematics-attitude-scale
Du, C., Qin, K., Wang, Y., & Xin, T. (2021). Mathematics interest, anxiety, self-efficacy and achievement: Examining reciprocal relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 91, 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102060
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/748467
Geary, D. C. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e318209edef
Granello, F., Cuder, A., Doz, E., Pellizzoni, S., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2025). Improving math self-efficacy and math self-concept in middle school: A narrative systematic review. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00939-5
Hidayat, A., & Firmanti, P. (2024). Navigating the tech frontier: A systematic review of technology integration in mathematics education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2373559
Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4
Jaudinez, A. S. (2019). Teaching senior high school mathematics: Problems and interventions. Pedagogical Research, 4(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5779
Jenifer, J. B., Rozek, C. S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2022). Effort(less) exam preparation: Math anxiety predicts the avoidance of effortful study strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2534–2541. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001202
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
King, Y. A., & Purpura, D. J. (2021). Direct numeracy activities and early math skills: Math language as a mediator. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.09.012
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-56948-000
Kul, Ü., Aksu, Z., & Satıcı, S. (2024). Adaptation of the modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: its relationship with mathematics self-efficacy and academic buoyancy. Current Psychology, 43, 21586-21595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05908-7
Landa, J., Berciano, A., & Marbán, J. M. (2025). Moderating effect of perceived self-efficacy on university students’ self-regulation in mathematics problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 3815–3839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10597-0
Lapinid, M. R. C., Cordel II, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., Chua, U. C., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2022). Which Filipino students are being left behind in mathematics? Testing machine learning models to differentiate lowest-performing Filipino students in public and private schools in the 2018 PISA mathematics test. Angelo King Institute for Economic and Business Studies (AKI). https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/res_aki/4
Lau, N. T. T., Ansari, D., & Sokolowski, H. M. (2024). Unraveling the interplay between math anxiety and math achievement. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(10), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.006
Lau, N. T. T., Hawes, Z., Tremblay, P., & Ansari, D. (2022). Disentangling the individual and contextual effects of math anxiety: A global perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(7), Article e2115855119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115855119
Li, Q., Cho, H., Cosso, J., & Maeda, Y. (2021). Relations between students’ mathematics anxiety and motivation to learn mathematics: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1017–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09589-z
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Martinsone, B., Di Sano, S., D’Elia, P., & La Salle-Finley, T. (2023). A conceptual framework for sustainable promotion of a positive school climate: Context, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0005
Mediana, N. L., Funa, A. A., & Dio, R. V. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IBL) on improving students’ conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(2), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). TIMSS 2011 grade 8 mathematics released items. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/TIMSS2011_G8_Math.pdf
Numajiri, T., & Kosaka, M. (2025). Study on the quality of mathematics education in primary schools in Sindh province, Pakistan. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1526845. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1526845
OECD. (2023a). Education GPS: Student Performance (PISA 2022). OECD. https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?plotter=h5&primaryCountry=PHL&treshold=10&topic=PI
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Philippines. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html
Özcan, Z. Ç. (2015). The relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning through homework behaviours, motivation, and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1080313
Pekrun, R. (2024). Control-value theory: From achievement emotion to a general theory of human emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Saha, M., Islam, S., Akhi, A. A., & Saha, G. (2024). Factors affecting success and failure in higher education mathematics: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Heliyon, 10(7), e29173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29173
Santos, J. C. D., & Boyon, M. C. L. (2020). Effect of inquiry-based lessons on STEM students’ learning competencies on limits and continuity. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 782–792. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.53.782792
Santos, J. P. E., Villarama, J. A., Adsuara, J. P., Gundran, J. F., De Guzman, A. G., & Ben, E. M. (2022). Students’ time management, academic procrastination, and performance during online science and mathematics classes. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(12), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.8
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2022). Pedagogical approaches in education. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/WPA-Special-Publication-2022-October.pdf
Shipley, B. (1997). Exploratory path analysis with applications in ecology and evolution. The American Naturalist, 149(6), 1113–1138. https://doi.org/10.1086/286041
Smith, J., Fotou, N., & Sharpe, R. (2025). Changes in mathematics anxiety and mathematics confidence. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 57(4), 758–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2475928
Svraka, B., & Ádám, S. (2022). Prevalence of cognitive and affective factors influencing mathematical performance. Journal of Early Years Education, 10(2-3), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2022.3.190.204
Sydänmaanlakka, A., Häsä, J., Holm, M. E., & Hannula, M. S. (2024). Mathematics-related achievement emotions – Interaction between learning environment and students’ mathematics performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 113, 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102486
Szczygieł, M. (2022). The psychometric properties of the Mathematics Attitude Scale for Adults (MASA). Current Psychology, 42, 18447-18458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02980-9
Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2021). A self-regulation model of mathematics achievement for eleventh-grade students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10076-8
Turanlı, N., Karakaş Türker, N., & Keçeli, V. (2008). Matematik alan derslerine yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi [Developing an attitude scale for courses in mathematics]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 254–262. https://research.hacettepe.edu.tr/en/publications/matematik-alan-derslerine-y%C3%B6nelik-tutum-%C3%B6l%C3%A7e%C7%A7i-geli%C5%9Ftirilmesi-2/
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2022). Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744
Wahyuni, R., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Mathematics anxiety of junior high school students in solving geometry problems. Perspectives of Science and Education, 71(5), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.5.26
Wang, C., Xu, Q., & Fei, W. Q. (2024). The effect of student-perceived teacher support on math anxiety: chain mediation of teacher–student relationship and math self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1333012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333012
Wen, R., & Dubé, A. K. (2022). A systematic review of secondary students’ attitudes towards mathematics and its relations with mathematics achievement. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(2), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7937
Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Li, H., Huang, B., Feng, H., Liu, C., & Si, J. (2024). Independent and joint effects of perceived teacher support and math self-efficacy on math achievement in primary school student: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, Article 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102445
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ace Amir Prescillas, Aniceto B. Naval
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
