Enhancing Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics among Rwandan Pre-Service Teachers through Hands-On Activities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i4.101

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Hands-On Activities, Mathematics Laboratory, Pre-Service Teachers, Constructivism

Abstract

This quantitative study investigated the effect of structured hands-on mathematics laboratory activities on the conceptual understanding of first-year pre-service teachers at a private higher learning institution in Rwanda and examined whether the frequency of laboratory participation predicted achievement gains. Grounded in Piagetian and Vygotskian constructivist learning theory, the study addressed two research questions: how participation in hands-on laboratory activities influences conceptual understanding relative to traditional instruction, and the extent to which participation frequency predicts improvement in conceptual understanding. A quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group pre-test–post-test design was adopted with 78 first-year pre-service teachers (37 females, 41 males) assigned to two intact groups of 39: an experimental group that engaged in an eight-week programme of structured, guided hands-on laboratory activities using manipulatives and digital tools, and a control group that received traditional lecture-based instruction covering identical content over the same total contact time. Data were collected using a researcher-developed Conceptual Understanding Test, a Laboratory Engagement Log Sheet, and a Background Questionnaire, all validated through expert review (content validity index above 0.80) and pilot testing, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.82 to 0.88. Paired-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation were used for analysis. Results showed that the experimental group achieved significantly greater gains in conceptual understanding (mean gain = 20.4, t(38) = 4.21, p < .001) than the control group (mean gain = 10.3, t(38) = 2.15, p = .038). A moderate, statistically significant positive correlation was also found between hours spent in the mathematics laboratory and achievement gains (r = 0.42, p = .002). These findings indicate that structured, guided hands-on laboratory activities enhance conceptual understanding more effectively than traditional instruction, and that sustained engagement strengthens this effect. The study concludes that teacher education programmes should institutionalize mathematics laboratory activities and offer targeted professional development on their effective, guided implementation to strengthen pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of mathematics.

References

Aprilia, D., Kintoko, K., & Siswanto, D. H. (2025). Effectiveness of the scramble learning model on students’ ability to understand mathematical concepts. Contemporary Education and Community Engagement, 2(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.12928/cece.v2i1.1282

Chen, J., Mokmin, M., Azlina, N., & Shen, Q. (2025). Effects of a flipped classroom learning system integrated with ChatGPT on students: a survey from China. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia & Artificial Intelligence, 9(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2025.02.007

Chengere, A. M., Bono, B. D., Zinabu, S. A., & Jilo, K. W. (2025). Enhancing secondary school students’ science process skills through guided inquiry-based laboratory activities in biology. PloS ONE, 20(4), e0320692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320692

Dagorn, E., Masclet, D., & Penard, T. (2025). Altruism, cooperativeness and academic achievement: A lab in the field experiment in French middle schools. Education Economics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2025.2450424

Dong, S., Zhi, R., & Gan, F. (2025). Integrating robotics in art education: leveraging constructivist and experiential learning frameworks to enhance cognitive development, problem‐solving skills and collaboration among diverse learners. European Journal of Education, 60(2), Article e70114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70114

Green, B. (2024). Effect of activity-based method on students’ academic performance in basic science. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(2), 57–62. https://fnasjournals.com/index.php/FNAS-JMSE/article/view/387

Jabeen, K., Muhammad, Z., Bibi, S., Shah, W. A., & Khan, N. (2025). Effect of activity based learning on student’s academic achievement and motivation in mathematics subject at secondary level. Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(5), 87–83. https://amresearchjournal.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/106

Jäder, J., & Johansson, H. (2025). Exploring students’ conceptual understanding through mathematical problem solving: students’ use of and shift between different representations of rational numbers. Research in Mathematics Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2456840

Li, M., & Nugraha, M. G. (2025). Validating a context-specific TPACK scale for primary mathematics education in China. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), Article em0819. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15934

Lichtenberger, A., Kokkonen, T., & Schalk, L. (2024). Learning with multiple external representations in physics: Concreteness fading versus simultaneous presentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(9), 2258–2290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21947

Matzakos, N., & Moundridou, M. (2025). Exploring large language models integration in higher education: a case study in a mathematics laboratory for civil engineering students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(3), Article e70049. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70049

Mohan, M., & Gupta, T. (2025). Enhancing mathematical problem-solving in diverse learners using constructivist approaches. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(9s), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.64252/g8dsdp44

Pellas, N. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking, spatial reasoning, and executive function skills: The impact of tangible programming tools in early childhood and across different learner stages. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241292767

Talafian, H., Lundsgaard, M., Mahmood, M. S., Kuo, E., & Stelzer, T. J. (2025). Teachers’ experiences with taking an open-ended approach in teaching labs in high school physics classes. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), Article 010140. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010140

Thiri, Y., Oo, M. T., & Paw, N. L. (2024). The hands-on learning impact to learning engagement. In 11th International Scholars Conference (pp. 1017–1033). https://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/isc/article/view/3473

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Niyibizi, O., Dushimimana, J. C., & Mutarutinya, V. (2026). Enhancing Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics among Rwandan Pre-Service Teachers through Hands-On Activities. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i4.101

Similar Articles

21-30 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.