Efforts to Improve Grade 12 Students’ Learning Outcomes on the Topic of Electrolysis Through the Problem-Based Learning Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v3i1.55

Keywords:

Problem-Based Learning, Electrolysis, Learning Outcomes, Classroom Action Research

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) to improve the chemistry learning outcomes of 12th-grade students on the topic of electrolysis. Chemistry learning often presents difficulties because many concepts are abstract, especially those involving microscopic processes such as ion movement and redox reactions. Preliminary observations revealed that more than 40% of students in class XII MIPA-1 at SMA Kolese De Britto had not yet reached the Minimum Completion Criteria (KKM = 80) on the topic of electrochemistry, with an average score of 70.57. To address this issue, PBL was applied as it emphasizes contextual problem-solving, student engagement, and the development of 21st-century skills. This research used a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design conducted in two cycles, each including planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The participants were 30 male students aged 17–18. The instruments consisted of: (1) a learning achievement test with 10 essay items developed according to basic competencies and scored with a rubric, (2) an observation sheet with 10 indicators of participation, collaboration, and discipline, (3) a Likert-scale questionnaire with 20 statements to assess motivation, perception, and problem-solving skills, and (4) documentation of learning activities through photos, field notes, and student products. Data were analyzed both quantitatively (mean scores, mastery percentages) and qualitatively (observations, questionnaires, reflections). The results showed a significant increase in student achievement. The average score rose from 70.57 (33.33% mastery) in the pretest to 79.57 (63.33% mastery) after Cycle I, and 85.16 (80% mastery) after Cycle II. Questionnaire results also indicated improved motivation and collaboration, from 85.07% in Cycle I to 89.59% in Cycle II. Observations confirmed more balanced participation and greater problem-solving engagement. Overall, this study concludes that PBL is effective for improving understanding of electrolysis while fostering critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity. The findings highlight that contextual problem-solving and guided discussions are crucial for bridging abstract chemistry concepts with real-world applications, making PBL a powerful approach for chemistry education.

References

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Fauziah, A., Rachmawati, N., & Munandar, A. (2023). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in improving students’ problem-solving skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 7(2), 112–120.

Haryanto, C. C., & Kusmiyati, K. (2021). Analisis penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar [Analysis of the application of the problem-based learning model in improving critical thinking skills of elementary school students]. Teaching: Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v2i3.1664

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21 [Scientific and contextual approaches in 21st-century learning]. Ghalia Indonesia.

Jamilah, F., Wahyuni, P., & Septarianto, T. W. (2023). The effect of the problem-based learning model on students critical thinking ability. International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review, 9(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i1.37837

Kasbolah, K. (2001). Penelitian tindakan kelas [Classroom action research]. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Loyens, S. M. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2015). Problem-based learning. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 18, pp. 200–204). Elsevier.

Martha, M. S., Rohman, F., Arianingsih, A., Nurhanurawati, N., & Wati, E. K. (2025). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis problem based learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada mata pelajaran matematika kelas II sekolah dasar [Development of problem-based learning (PBL)-based student worksheets to improve students’ critical thinking in mathematics in second-grade elementary school]. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i3.28339

Putri, R. (2022). Penggunaan model problem based learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa [Using problem-based learning (PBL) models to improve students’ critical thinking skills]. Lambda: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 5(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.58218/lambda.v5i2.1408

Rachmawati, N. Y., & Rosy, B. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah pada mata pelajaran administrasi umum kelas X OTKP di SMK Negeri 10 Surabaya [The effect of problem-based learning (PBL) models on critical thinking and problem-solving skills in the general administration subject of grade X OTKP at SMK Negeri 10 Surabaya]. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 9(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p246-259

Sari, P. D. P., Sedana, I. M., & Handayani, N. N. L. (2025). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning berpendekatan keterampilan proses sains terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar IPA peserta didik kelas VI [The effect of a problem-based learning model using a science process skills approach on the motivation and science learning outcomes of sixth-grade students]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 15(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v15i2.95786

Suci, S. K., Muhaimin, M., & Zurweni, Z. (2022). The implementation and effect of problem-based learning based on local wisdom toward students’ communication and critical thinking ability on temperature and heat topic. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08115

Sudjana, N. (2005). Metode statistika [Statistical methods]. Tarsito.

Sugihartono, A., Fathiyah, K. N., Harahap, F., Setiawati, F. A., & Setiawan, H. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan [Educational psychology]. UNY Press.

Suprijono, A. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran di era digital [Learning strategies in the digital era]. Universitas Terbuka Press.

Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2012). Collaborative problem-based learning in mathematics: A cognitive load perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.051

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Setyowati, S. P. (2026). Efforts to Improve Grade 12 Students’ Learning Outcomes on the Topic of Electrolysis Through the Problem-Based Learning Model. Journal of Research in Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrese.v3i1.55

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.