Scaling Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Schools Through Stakeholder Mapping: Teachers’ Perspectives on Enablers and Barriers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v2i2.48

Keywords:

Gender Equality, Secondary School, Social Inclusion, Stakeholder Mapping, Teachers

Abstract

Stakeloder engagement is crucial for driving Gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) initiatives. Using Participatory Action Research, this situational analysis (SAS) study explored people, place, and things catergorised into four scaling groups: initiators, enablers, competitors, and the impacted for scaling GESI initiatives in schools and communities effectively through stakeholder engagement. The research during the participation axis phase administered a survey questionnaire to teachers, including five males and females, to analyse stakeholders responsible for promoting GESI in schools. Key findings revealed that Initiators, such as school leaders and educators, played a crucial role in driving GESI-related changes within schools. Enablers, including local community leaders and supportive teachers, were instrumental in ensuring the successful implementation and sustainability of GESI initiatives. However, challenges arose from Competitors, including senior citizens, religious practitioners, and some local leaders, whose conservative beliefs often impeded progress. The Impacted group, consisting of marginalized students, teachers, and women affected by gender inequality, was identified as the primary beneficiary of successful GESI initiatives. Despite its valuable insights, the study has a few limitations. The perspectives gathered were primarily from teachers, which may not fully capture the views of all relevant stakeholders, particularly those from marginalized groups or other community members. Additionally, the categorization of stakeholders, especially within the Competitors and Impacted groups, may lack sufficient nuance in certain contexts. The study recommends a more inclusive stakeholder engagement process that involves all groups, including Competitors, through participatory dialogue to address resistance and foster collaborative solutions. Continuous capacity-building efforts for teachers, school leaders, and policymakers are essential to ensure the sustainability of GESI initiatives. Future research should expand the analysis to include a broader range of stakeholders and account for regional variations in the implementation of GESI initiatives.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Carlson, M. P., O’Bryan, A. E., Strayer, J. F., McNicholl, T. H., & Hagman, J. E. (2024). Considering, piloting, scaling and sustaining a research-based precalculus curriculum and professional development innovation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73, 101126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101126

Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2008). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 231–254). Sense Publishers.

Foote, K., Knaub, A., Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Beichner, R. J. (2016). Enabling and challenging factors in institutional reform: The case of SCALE-UP. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010103

Fulgence, K. (2024). Scaling Education Innovations in Tanzania, Kenya, and Zambia: Assessing the Design of School In-service Teacher Training. In The Sustainability of Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Quality Assurance Perspectives (pp. 193-221). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46242-9_9

Krainer, K., Zehetmeier, S., Hanfstingl, B., Rauch, F., & Tscheinig, T. (2019). Insights into scaling up a nationwide learning and teaching initiative on various levels. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9826-3

McLean, R., & Gargani, J. (2019). Scaling Impact: Innovation for the Public Good. Routledge.

Moloney, J. F., & Oakley, B. (2010). Scaling online education: Increasing access to higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 55-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v14i1.1639

OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (GPT-4) [Large language model]. Retrieved from https://chat.openai.com

Price-Kelly, H., van Haeren, L., & McLean, R. (2020). The Scaling Playbook. International Development Research Centre.

Sabelli, N. H., & Harris, C. J. (2015). The role of innovation in scaling up educational innovations. In Scaling educational innovations (pp. 13-30). Springer Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_2

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Walker, M. (2007). Schooling and the Capability Approach: A Framework for Evaluating Education and Well-being. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-02

How to Cite

Seden, K. (2025). Scaling Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Schools Through Stakeholder Mapping: Teachers’ Perspectives on Enablers and Barriers. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 2(2), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v2i2.48

Similar Articles

11-20 of 57

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.