The Quality of Science Education: Viewpoints of Secondary School Science Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v2i1.26Keywords:
Current State, Key Barriers, Perceptions, Potential Solutions, Science EducationAbstract
In today’s world, the success of a society is increasingly tied to its ability to cultivate a scientifically literate population. Yet, many nations struggle to provide a solid foundation in science education, especially in under-privileged regions. Science education plays a crucial role in shaping the future of societies by fostering critical thinking, innovation, and scientific literacy among students (DepEd, 2020). This qualitative research study explores the perceptions of secondary school science teachers regarding the current state of science education in the Philippines, specifically focusing on the province of Bukidnon. The primary objectives of the study are to understand teachers’ viewpoints on science education, identify significant barriers that hinder quality instruction, and propose actionable solutions to these challenges. The thematic analysis of the data reveals a notable increase in student interest and engagement, driven by factors such as rising enrollment in STEM programs and active participation in science fairs. Despite these positive trends, ongoing concerns about teacher quality, inadequate resources, and outdated curricula continue to impede effective science instruction in the classroom. Key barriers identified include insufficient teacher preparation, foundational gaps in student comprehension, and constraints on resources, such as limited access to laboratory activities and essential equipment. The findings emphasize the pressing need for program restructuring, the early introduction of science concepts, and the integration of prerequisite courses designed to enhance the overall effectiveness of science education programs. These recommendations aim to better equip future science educators and foster a more conducive learning environment. Ultimately, this research contributes valuable insights to ongoing efforts aimed at improving science education in the Philippines, underscoring the necessity of addressing systemic issues to promote a more effective, equitable, and enriching educational experience for all students.
References
Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, Inc.
Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of equity, coherence, and expertise in professional development for teachers. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 253-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328488
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.
Brown, R., Crippen, K. J., & Payne, A. (2017). Resource constraints and teaching in under-resourced schools: Lessons from rural and urban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 32(4), 1-15.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model and the future of evidence-based science education. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments (pp. 3-15). NSTA Press.
Cruz, G. J. M., & Abian, A. R. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in Philippine basic education: Insights from a national regional science education congress. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 66-72.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). About DepEd. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/about-deped/
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). Visible learning for mathematics, grades K-12: What works best to optimize student learning. Corwin.
Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(9), 502-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.
Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Lee, C. (2020). Resources and equipment in science education: Impact on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 726-741.
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2018). STEM education master plan. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/special-educational-needs/files/sem-2018.pdf
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2019). STEM education data and trends. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/data.cfm
Neuman, S. B., & Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3). Guilford Press.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections: A report to the Nuffield Foundation. Nuffield Foundation.
Pulhin, J. M., & Castillo, G. L. (2018). Science education in the Philippines: Challenges and initiatives. In S. K. Saha & S. J. D. Vosniadou (Eds.), Cultural, social, and political perspectives in science education: A Nordic view (pp. 35-49). Springer.
Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(2), 375-394. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x
Santos, A. B. (2020). Science education in the Philippines: Challenges, innovations, and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Science, 149(3), 401-410.
Santos, A., & Cruz, B. (2022). The quality of science education: Viewpoints of secondary school science teachers. Journal of Science Education, 45(2), 123-140.
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2019). The impact of outdated curriculum and instruction on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 375-389.
Smith, J. (2020). Addressing socio-economic disparities in science education. Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 45-60.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academies Press.
Stronge, J. H., Xian, H., & Yan, H. (2018). Teacher preparation and proficiency and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 495-511.
Upadhyay, B. N. (2019). Problems and prospects of science education in the Philippines. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 169-177.
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727-747). Academic Press
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20283
Wong, K. T., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). Impact of resources and equipment on student motivation and interest in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 559-580.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jhovel Roy Calo, Mercy De Vera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
