A Systematic Literature Review of Augmented Reality–Oriented Professional Development Programs for Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jcsml.v3i2.65Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Teacher Education, Teacher Professional Development, Technology EducationAbstract
Augmented Reality (AR) combines real-world experiences with virtual elements and offers various positive educational outcomes. However, one obstacle hindering AR’s use in education is teachers’ limited pedagogical knowledge regarding the instructional implementation of AR in teaching. Supporting teachers with professional development programmes to integrate this novel technology into education is salient. Thus, this study analysed 17 professional development programmes focused on integrating AR into teaching. For this purpose, a framework was applied to examine dimensions that make training effective, including the type of activity (traditional and reform), duration, collective participation, content focus (theoretical, pedagogical and practical knowledge), active learning (e.g., observing teaching, planning classroom implementation, reviewing student work, and presenting, leading, and writing), and coherence (e.g., connections with goals, alignment with state and district standards and assessments). Findings from the systematic analysis indicated that the majority of teacher professional development programmes addressed theoretical, pedagogical, and practical knowledge. However, observation of teaching and review of students’ work in active learning dimensions were lacking. Regarding the general characteristics of studies, most employed a mixed-method approach and delivered the programme in person. Marker-based augmented reality was the most preferred type, and smartphones and tablets were the most commonly used electronic devices. The findings can be beneficial for AR-oriented professional development studies by presenting an overview of effective professional development programme dimensions. Nonetheless, there is still a need for effective AR-oriented professional development programmes for pre- and in-service teachers, and this review can assist in developing new teacher professional development programmes focusing on AR.
References
Ajani, O. A., & Govender, S. (2023). Impact of ICT-driven teacher professional development for the enhancement of classroom practices in South Africa: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(5), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0125
Aktamiş, H., & Arici, V. A. (2013). Sanal gerçeklik programlarının astronomi konularının öğretiminde kullanılmasının akademik başarı ve kalıcılığına etkisi. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 58–70. https://izlik.org/JA97WF72YD
Alshehri, A. (2021). The effectiveness of a micro-learning strategy in developing the skills of using augmented reality applications among science teachers in Jeddah. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.869642
Amanatidis, N. (2015). Unveiling the teachers’ profiles through an INSET (in-service training) course of Greek primary school teachers in the pedagogy of ICT (information and communications technology) in-classroom instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9275-7
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Aso, B., & Rivero, P. (2021). Quality requirements for implementing augmented reality in heritage spaces: Teachers’ perspective. Education Sciences, 11(8), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080405
Avalos, B. (2010). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Avci, Z. Y., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
Aziz, K., Aziz, N., Yusof, A., & A., P. (2012). Potential for providing augmented reality elements in special education via cloud computing. Procedia Engineering, 41, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.181
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
Ball, L., Drijvers, P., Ladel, S., Siller, H. S., Tabach, M., & Vale, C. (2018). Uses of technology in primary and secondary mathematics education: Tools, topics and trends. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4
Barrett-Greenly, T. C. (2013). Investigating the impact of professional development on teacher practices and beliefs regarding the use of mobile educational applications in the classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations. University of Delaware. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1319305643
Barrow, J., Forker, C., Sands, A., O’Hare, D., & Hurst, W. (2019). Augmented reality for enhancing life science education. In VISUAL 2019 - The Fourth International Conference on Applications and Systems of Visual Paradigms. https://personales.upv.es/thinkmind/dl/conferences/visual/visual_2019/visual_2019_1_20_78003.pdf
Basma, B., & Savage, R. (2018). Teacher professional development and student literacy growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9416-4
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 5-59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ873676.pdf
Bechtel, P. A., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Effective professional development—What we now know. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.4.363
*Belda-Medina, J. (2022). Using augmented reality (AR) as an authoring tool in EFL through mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Teaching English with Technology, 22(2), 115–135. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1354648.pdf
Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617
Burns, M. (2010). Not too distant: A survey of strategies for teacher support in distance education programs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 108–117. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/156103
Cai, S., Niu, X., Wen, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Interaction analysis of teachers and students in inquiry class learning based on augmented reality by iFIAS and LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5551–5567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012808
Carson, R. L., & Chase, M. A. (2009). An examination of physical education teacher motivation from a self-determination theoretical framework. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980802301866
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students ‘ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.352
Chiu, M.-H., Chou, C.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Hung, T., Tang, W.-T., Hsu, J.-W., Liaw, H. L., & Tsai, M.-K. (2019). Model-based learning about structures and properties of chemical elements and compounds via the use of augmented realities. Chemistry Teacher International, 1(1), 20180002. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0002
Cole, M. (2023). The importance of building teachers’ intrinsic control into the design of professional development (PD) programmes. Professional Development in Education, 51(5), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2291355
Collins, L. J., & Liang, X. (2014). Task relevance in the design of online professional development for teachers of ELLs: AQ methodology study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.712752
Costa, M. C., Santos, P., Patrício, J. M., & Manso, A. (2021). An interactive information system that supports an augmented reality game in the context of game-based learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(12), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5120082
De Souza, R., Parveen, R., Chupradit, S., Velasco, L. G., Arcinas, M., Tabuena, A. C., & Ventayen, R. J. M. (2021). Language teachers’ pedagogical orientations in integrating technology in the online classroom: Its effect on students motivation and engagement. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844678
Deglau, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). The effects of a long-term professional development program on the beliefs and practices of experienced teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.4.379
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2022). Developing students’ critical thinking skills and argumentation abilities through augmented reality–based argumentation activities in science classes. Science and Education, 32, 1165–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
DeSantis, J. (2012). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard investment: Three guiding principles for designing effective professional development. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(2), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.607867
Desimone, L., Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A., & Yoon, K. S. (2003). Improving teachers’ in-service professional development in mathematics and science: The role of postsecondary institutions. Educational Policy, 17(5), 613–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803256791
Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case‐based long‐term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1413–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102946
Drijvers, P. (2019). Head in the clouds, feet on the ground – A realistic view on using digital tools in mathematics education. In A. Büchter, M. Glade, R. Herold-Blasius, M. Klinger, F. Schacht, & P. Scherer (Eds.), Vielfältige zugänge zum mathematikunterricht (pp. 163–176). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24292-3_12
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
*Freese, M., Teichrew, A., Winkelmann, J., Erb, R., Ullrich, M., & Tremmel, M. (2023). Measuring teachers’ competencies for a purposeful use of augmented reality experiments in physics lessons. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1180266. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1180266
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Garrett, R., Citkowicz, M., & Williams, R. (2019). How responsive is a teacher’s classroom practice to intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized field studies. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X19830634
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
*George, K., Anastasios, M. T., Dimitrios, M., & Christos, C. (2023). The mobile augmented reality acceptance model for teachers and future teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 7855–7893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12116-6
Gómez-García, G., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Alonso-García, S., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Mobile learning in pre-service teacher education: Perceived usefulness of AR technology in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(6), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060275
Getenet, S. T. (2020). Designing a professional development program for mathematics teachers for effective use of technology in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1855–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10056-8
Gilbert, K. A., Voelkel, R. H., & Johnson, C. W. (2018). Increasing self-efficacy through immersive simulations: Leading professional learning communities. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(4), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I3/R9
*Gokbulut, B., & Durnali, M. (2023). Professional skills training in developing digital materials through augmented and virtual reality applications. Psychology in the Schools, 60(11), 4267–4292. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22991
Hegedus, S., Laborde, C., Brady, C., Dalton, S., Siller, H.-S., Tabach, M., Trgalova, J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2017). Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42611-2
Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P, Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Hsieh, M. C. (2021). Development and application of an augmented reality oyster learning system for primary marine education. Electronics, 10(22), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10222818
Huang, C. Y., Chou, Y. Y., Chen, C. H., & Tsai, Y. H. (2022). Applying activity system-based process model in augmented reality-based learning for natural science course in elementary school. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), 9579766. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579766
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán Molina, D., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2016). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: The effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2445761
Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2653–2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z
Irwanto, I., Dianawati, R., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Trends of augmented reality applications in science education: A systematic review from 2007 to 2022. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(13), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.30587
Jagari, C. B. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions on the role of classroom observation for their professional development (Doctoral dissertation, Tribhuvan University, Nepal). https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/1951
Jančaříková, K., & Eva, S. (2019). Uses of augmented reality for development of natural literacy in pre-primary education. In T. Prodromou (Ed.), Augmented reality in educational settings (pp. 24–55). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408845_002
Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education—a case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198
Kalyar, M. N., Ahmad, B., & Kalyar, H. (2018). Does teacher motivation lead to student motivation? The mediating role of teaching behavior. Educational Studies Moscow, 3, 91-119. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-91-119
*Karacan, C. G., & Polat, M. (2022). Predicting pre-service English language teachers’ intentions to use augmented reality. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(3), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2083731
*Ke, F., & Hsu, Y. (2015). Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.003
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00073-8
Krug, M., Thoms, L., & Huwer, J. (2023). Augmented reality in the science Classroom—Implementing pre-service teacher training in the competency area of simulation and modeling according to the DiKoLAN F-framework. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101016
Kyureghyan, H. (2023). Exploring teachers’ learning experiences and core components of the professional development programme within a pilot reform project in Armenia. Teacher Development, 27(5), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2213678
Lai, A.-F., Chen, C.-H., & Lee, G.-Y. (2018). An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12716
Laine, T. H., Nygren, E., Dirin, A., & Suk, H.-J. (2016). Science Spots AR: A platform for science learning games with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9419-0
*Lasica, I. E., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Katzis, K. (2020). Augmented reality in lower secondary education: A teacher professional development program in Cyprus and Greece. Education Sciences, 10(4), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040121
Ledger, S. (2021). Resilience building for pre-service teachers: BRiTE, micro-teaching and augmented reality/simulation (BRiTE-AR). In C. F. Mansfield (Ed.), Cultivating teacher resilience international approaches, applications and impact (p. 245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_15
Lindvall, J., Kirsten, N., Eriksson, K., Brehmer, D., & Ryve, A. (2025). Does the duration of professional development programs influence effects on instruction? An analysis of 174 lessons during a national-scale program. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2198101
Lo, C. K. (2021). Design principles for effective teacher professional development in integrated STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 136–152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48629251
Luneta, K. (2012). Designing continuous professional development programmes for teachers: A literature review. Africa Education Review, 9(2), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2012.722395
MacCallum, K., & Parsons, D. (2022). Integrating mobile mixed reality to enhance learning before, during, and after physical field trips. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.304456
Marín-Marín, J. A., López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2023). Attitudes towards the development of good practices with augmented reality in secondary education teachers in Spain. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1443-1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09671-9
*Marín, V., Sampedro, B. E., Muñoz González, J. M., & Vega, E. M. (2022). Primary education and augmented reality. Other form to learn. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082082
Marques, M. M., & Pombo, L. (2021). The impact of teacher training using mobile augmented reality games on their professional development. Education Sciences, 11(8), 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080404
*Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Carrilho, A. R., Charalambous, C., Mavrou, K., & Christou, C. (2020). Teacher training for ‘augmented reading’: The living book approach and initial results. Education Sciences, 10(5), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050144
*Mystakidis, S., Fragkaki, M., & Filippousis, G. (2021). Ready teacher one: Virtual and augmented reality online professional development for K-12 school teachers. Computers, 10(10), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100134
*Nikimaleki, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Effects of a collaborative AR-enhanced learning environment on learning gains and technology implementation beliefs: Evidence from a graduate teacher training course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 758–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12646
*O’Shea, P., & Curry-Corcoran, D. (2013). The viability and value of student- and teacher-created augmented reality experiences. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070106
*Oberdörfer, S., Birnstiel, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Grafe, S. (2021). Mutual benefits: Interdisciplinary education of pre-service teachers and HCI students in VR/AR learning environment design. Frontiers in Education, 6, 693012. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693012
Parga, S. G., Singh, U., Gutierrez, J., & Marks, S. (2023). Pedagogical design in education using augmented reality: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4219–4236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2195445
Parker, C., Abel, Y., & Denisova, E. (2015). Urban elementary STEM initiative. School Science and Mathematics, 115(6), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12133
Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2
Perifanou, M., Economides, A. A., & Nikou, S. A. (2022). Teachers’ views on integrating augmented reality in education: Needs, opportunities, challenges and recommendations. Future Internet, 15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
*Pombo, L., & Marques, M. M. (2021). Guidelines for teacher training in mobile augmented reality games: Hearing the teachers’ voices. Education Sciences, 11(10), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100597
Quintero, E., Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., & Ramírez, H. (2015). Augmented reality app for calculus: A proposal for the development of spatial visualization. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.251
Rahmat, M. K., & Mohamad, N. (2021). Modelling the successful integration of mobile augmented reality technology (MART) among Malaysian preservice teachers. International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling, 6(38), 57–65. https://gaexcellence.com/ijepc/article/view/3235
Ripsam, M., & Nerdel, C. (2024). Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy toward augmented reality in chemistry education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1293571. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1293571
Romano, M., Díaz, P., & Aedo, I. (2023). Empowering teachers to create augmented reality experiences: the effects on the educational experience. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1546–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1851727
Sáez-López, J. M., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., González-Calero, J. A., & Gómez Carrasco, C. J. (2020). Augmented reality in higher education: An evaluation program in initial teacher training. Education Sciences, 10(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020099
Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710
Sharma, S., Tuli, N., & Mantri, A. (2022). Augmented reality in educational environments: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v36i2/22149
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
Simonova, O., & Kolesnichenko, A. (2022). The effectiveness of the augmented reality application in foreign language teaching in higher school. SHS Web of Conferences, 137, 01025. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213701025
*Sulisworo, D., Drusmin, R., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Handayani, T., Wahyuningsih, W., Jufriansah, A., & Prasetyo, E. (2021). The science teachers’ optimism response to the use of marker-based augmented reality in the global warming issue. Education Research International, 2021(1), 7264230. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7264230
Teo, T. (2015). Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers’ acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers & Education, 83, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
Unger, K. L., & Tracey, M. W. (2013). Examining the factors of a technology professional development intervention. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(3), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9070-x
Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2%3C137::AID-TEA1001%3E3.0.CO;2-U
Walker, H., Hennessy, S., & Pimmer, C. (2023). Trialling open educational resources for technology-supported teacher professional development in rural Zimbabwe. Research Papers in Education, 38(4), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2034925
*Wang, T., & Tan, L. (2023). The conceptualisation of user-app interactivity in augmented reality-mediated learning: Implications for literacy education. Sustainability, 15(14), 10949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410949
*Wannapiroon, P., Nilsook, P., Kaewrattanapat, N., Wannapiroon, N., & Supa, W. (2021). Augmented reality interactive learning model, using the imagineering process for the SMART classroom. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1404. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-51
Warford, M. K. (2011). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.008
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.017
Widodo, A., & Riandi. (2013). Dual-mode teacher professional development: challenges and re-visioning future TPD in Indonesia. Teacher Development, 17(3), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813757
Wiest, L. R. (2001). The role of computers in mathematics teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 17(1–2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v17n01_05
Wu, C.-L., & Tsai, Y.-H. (2023). Effects of video prompting with augmented reality on functional living skills of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231170594
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Xu, W. W., Su, C. Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C. H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z
Yılmaz, Ö., & Malone, K. L. (2020). Preservice teachers perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00126-7
Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding of challenging science content. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 156–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.156
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sahesenem Oz, Bahadır Namdar, Tuğba Yüksel, Ibrahim Delen, Gökhan İnce
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
