Map and Trends in International Production on Biology Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i2.63

Keywords:

Bibliometric Analysis, Biology Education, Literature Mapping, Research Trends

Abstract

This study maps publications on biology education in the Web of Science database, aiming to understand its development and the most recent trends. A sample of 422 scientific articles was selected. Their metadata was bibliometrically analyzed using tools from the Bibliometrix statistical package. After reading the abstracts, the articles were categorized according to their type, research participants, thematic focus, and research design. It was found that publications on biology education have been growing, especially after 2014. The three main journals, the ten main authors, and the ten most impactful works in relation to the analyzed corpus are identified. The analyses showed that there is a small group of more prolific authors amidst a large mass of researchers with one or two publications, a proportion that suggests a dispersion of interest in the topic. The most important themes in the structure of academic production are related to “misconceptions” and “evolution,” which are among its motor themes, while descriptors such as “knowledge” and “concepts” stand out among the basic themes of the field. This suggests the importance of discussing the conceptual structure of biological knowledge, highlighting beliefs, attitudes, and the understanding of basic concepts. The thematic structure also reveals a concern with the training of biology teachers. The research reported is mainly survey-based, conducted with higher education students, and refers to teaching strategies or materials and psychological factors related to the teaching-learning process. Given the sample, research in the area is still dispersed among many authors who publish few works and cooperate little, which seems to indicate that the field is still seeking unity.

References

Amarante, V., Burger, R., Chelwa, G., Cockburn, J., Kassouf, A., McKay, A., & Zurbrigg, J. (2021). Underrepresentation of developing country researchers in development research. Applied Economics Letters, 29(17), 1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1965528

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2

DeHaan, R. L. (2011). Education research in the biological sciences: A nine-decade review [Commissioned paper]. Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, National Research Council. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072581.pdf

Dirks, C. (2011). The current status and future direction of biology education research. Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, held 18–19 October 2010, in Washington, DC. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_071087

diSessa, A. A. (2022). A history of conceptual change research. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 114-133). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295.008

Dolan, E. L., Elliott, L. S., Henderson, C., Curran-Everett, E., St. John, K., & Ortiz, A. P. (2018). Evaluating discipline-based education research for promotion and tenure. Innovative Higher Education, 43(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9406-y

Gul, S., & Sozbilir, M. (2016). International trends in biology education research from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of papers in selected journals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1631-1651. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1363a

Herak, R., Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, Z., & Novianti, V. (2025). Exploring misconceptions in biology learning: A systematic literature review. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. 5, 1743, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251743

Hsu, J. L., Chen, A., Cruz-Hinojoza, E., Dinh-Dang, D., Roth-Johnson, E. A., Sato, B. K., & Lo S. M. (2021). Characterizing biology education research: perspectives from practitioners and scholars in the field. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22, e00147-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00147-21

Jenkins, E. W. (2016). 50 years of JBE: The evolution of biology as a school subject. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3). pp. 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1202484

Kloser, M. (2012). A place for the nature of biology in biology education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 1-21. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/10994

Konu Kadirhanoğulları, M., & Özay Köse, E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of articles related misconception in biology by country and journal. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 22(2), 3567–3581. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.or580

Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: A new biology education for the twenty-first century? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092

Lo, S. M., Gardner, G. E., Reid, J., Napoleon-Fanis, V., Carroll, P., Smith, E., & Sato, B. K. (2019). Prevailing questions and methodologies in biology education research: A longitudinal analysis of research in CBE—Life Sciences Education and at the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), ar9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0164

Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21:rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134

Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: A bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116, 2175-2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9

Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2007). Is there science beyond English? EMBO Reports, 8(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400906

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

National Research Council. (1970). Biology and the future of man. In The Life Sciences: Recent Progress and Application to Human Affairs (pp. 427-470). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/20497

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

Nehm, R. H. (2019). Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(15), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290

Nurdin, A. M., Gofur, A., Sari, M. S., & Munzil, M. (2025). Technology-supported differentiated biology education: Trends, methods, content, and impacts. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2598. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16044

Özel, M. (2024). An analysis of research trends on socio-scientific issues in science education over two decades from 2004 to 2023. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/jmste.1.1.69

Permana, T. I., Husamah, H., Nurhamdani, M. I., Zaskia, A., Savitri, A., & Salsabila, D. A. (2024). Augmented reality in biology education: A systematic literature review. Research and Development in Education, 4(1), 630-652. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32636

Rahmi, S. N., Megawati, M., Alberida, H., & Fadilah, M. (2025). Assessment of biology learning outcomes in education: A systematic literature review. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 18(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.47179

Reid, J., Gardner, G. E., Carroll, P., Napoleon-Fanis, V., & Smith, E. (2016, November). A history of biology education research from 2002 to 2015: A synthesis of methodological trends. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Mobile, AL, United States.

Rosenthal, D. (1990). What’s past is prologue: Lessons from the history of biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 52(3), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449067

Sánchez Gómez, M. C., Cabanillas García, J. L., del Brio Alonso, I., & Verdugo Castro, S. (2025). Métodos de investigación en el área educativa. Análisis bibliométrico: estudio comparativo entre Scopus y WoS. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 46, 141–172. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.46.2025.40201

Sangur, K., Zubaidah, S., & Sulisetijono (2025). A systematic literature review of mobile learning trends in biology education over ten years. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(1), 101429, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101429

Semilarski, H., & Laius, A. (2018). Exploring biological literacy: A systematic literature review of biological literacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1181

Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2013). Biology education research: Lessons and future directions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-03-0058

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Matias, H. J. D., & de Souza, B. O. (2026). Map and Trends in International Production on Biology Education. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i2.63

Similar Articles

1-10 of 33

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.