Evaluating the Teaching of Physical Science Practical Work at a Selected Resource-Constrained Secondary School in Rundu Circuit, Kavango East Region

Authors

  • Tomas Shivolo Department of Secondary and Postgraduate Education, The International University of Management, Namibia
  • Cornelin Urungi Kamina Department of Secondary and Postgraduate Education, The International University of Management, Namibia
  • Gabriel Nembenge Department of Secondary and Postgraduate Education, The International University of Management, Namibia
  • Martha Mewiliko Nangutuwala Department of Secondary and Postgraduate Education, The International University of Management, Namibia
  • Fredrick Simataa Simasiku Department of Secondary and Postgraduate Education, The International University of Management, Namibia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.14

Keywords:

National Standard, Physical Science, Practical Work, Resources-Constrained Schools, Secondary Education

Abstract

This study evaluated the teaching of Physical Science practical work at a resource-constrained secondary school in the Rundu Circuit, Kavango East region in Namibia. The research objectives were to assess the impact of practical work on learners’ academic performance in a resource-constrained community, identify the challenges faced by both teachers and learners in conducting practical activities, and propose strategies to address these challenges and improve the overall quality of science education. A qualitative research design was employed, with data collected through semi-structured interviews involving four Physical Science teachers. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, with themes aligned to the research objectives. The findings revealed that the state of science practical work was poor due to a lack of sufficient laboratory equipment and resources. Other significant challenges identified included limited laboratory space, inadequate time allocation, overcrowded classrooms, a lack of motivation among learners, and insufficient background knowledge on practical work for learners. These challenges collectively impeded effective teaching and learning of science practical work. To overcome these issues, the study recommended providing adequate laboratory materials and constructing an additional laboratory to alleviate overcrowding. The study also further recommended the employment of laboratory technicians to assist teachers in organizing, planning and conducting practical activities more efficiently. Furthermore, the study suggested forming partnerships between schools to share laboratory facilities, as per Key Area 7 of the National Standard and Performance Indicators for Schools in Namibia, which emphasizes the importance of collaborative linkages within educational communities. By implementing these strategies, it was concluded that the quality of Physical Science practical work in resource-constrained schools could be significantly enhanced, leading to improved learner outcomes.

References

Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305

Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036

Alkan, F. (2016). Experiential learning: Its effects on achievement and scientific process skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.36681/

Antwi, V., Sakyi-Hagan, N. A., Addo-Wuver, F., & Asare, B. (2021). Effect of practical work on physics learning effectiveness: A case of a senior high school in Ghana. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(3), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2021v02i03.0102

Asheela, E., Ngcoza, K. M., & Sewry, J. (2020). The use of easily accessible resources during hands-on practical activities in rural under-resourced Namibian schools. In School science practical work in Africa (pp. 14-31). Routledge.

Babalola, F. (2017). Advancing practical physics in Africa’s schools. Open University (United Kingdom). https://oro.open.ac.uk/50740/

Babalola, F. E., Lambourne, R. J., & Swithenby, S. J. (2020). The real aims that shape the teaching of practical physics in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09962-7

Bada, A. A., Akinbobola, A. O., & Damoeroem, E. O. (2018). Measured identification and remediation of students’ weakness in Nigerian senior secondary school Physics curriculum. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 5(10), 13-19.

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850

Bernholt, S., Broman, K., Siebert, S., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Digitising teaching and learning– additional perspectives for chemistry education. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6), 554-564. 42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800090

Bhat, A. (2020). Types and methods of interviews in research. Retrieved from https://www.questionpro.com>blog

Blumbery et al., (2021). Methodology of educational research. Lotus Press.

Bradley, J. (2021). Achieving the aims of practical work with microchemistry. In Research in chemistry education (pp. 23-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59882-2_2

Chala, A. A., Wami, I. K. S., Aklilu, E., & Kassa, T. (2019). Determinant Factors Affect the Implementation of Laboratory Work in Science Subjects at Secondary Schools in Bale Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-13-09

Cheung, D., (2011). Teacher beliefs about implementing guided inquiry laboratory experiments for secondary school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education., 88(11), 1462–1468. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1008409

Cigdemoglu, C., & Köseoğlu, F. (2019). Improving science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry: Reflections from a professional development program aiming to advance science centre-school curricula integration. Science & Education, 28(3), 439-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00054-0

Costa, K. (2019). Systematic guide to qualitative data analysis within the COSTA postgraduate research model. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-9132

Creswell, J. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approaches. University Of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Creswell, J.W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (8th ed.). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Dayal, P. D., & Ali-Chand, Z. (2022). Effective teaching and learning strategies in a chemistry classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 57(2), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00242-7

Dillon, J. (2008). A review of the research on practical work in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.

Dillon, J., & Osborne, J. (2010). How Science Works: What is the nature of scientific reasoning and what do we know about students’ understanding? Good Practice in Science Teaching. In J. Dillon (Ed.), Good Practice in Science Teaching (pp. 20-45). Open University Press.

Dougherty, M. R., Slevc, L. R. and Grand, J. A. (2019). Making research evaluation more transparent: aligning research philosophy, institutional values, and reporting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810693

Flick, U. (2022). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design.

Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114%2Fjets.v7i12.4491

Frey, B. (2018). Educational research, measurement, and evaluation. SAGE Publications.

Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70(256), 33-40.

Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22(1), 85-142.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Kabir, S. (2016). Basic guidelines for research: an introductory approach for all disciplines edition. Book Zone Publication.

Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 534-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075

Kasiyo, C., Denuga, D., & Mukwambo, M. (2017). An investigation and intervention on challenges faced by Natural Science Teachers when conducting practical work in three Selected School of Zambezi region in Namibia. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology and Sciences, 34(1), 23-33. http://asrjetsjournal.org/

Kothari, C. (2017). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques by CR Kothari. New Age International.

Liswaniso, J. L. (2019). An Investigation into Teaching of Biology and Physical Science Practical Work in Senior Secondary Schools in the Zambezi Region of Namibia. University of Namibia.

Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 393-441.

Maree, K. (2017). First steps in research. Van Schaik Publishers.

Mary, T., & Suganya, S. (2022). Research design: Principles and applications. Pearson Education.

Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Commissioned paper by the Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences.

Ministry of Basic Education and Culture, (2001). Organisation and Establishment: Staffing Norms: Teaching Staff at Schools. Formal Education Circular 13/2001. Government Gazette.

Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture. (2015). Physical Science syllabus Grade 8 & 9. Retrieved from http://www.nied.edu.na

Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture. (2016). National Curriculum for Basic Education. Retrieved from http://www.nied.edu.na

Naidoo, J., & Sibanda, D. (2020). Examining science performance of South African grade 9 learners in TIMSS 2015 through a gender lens. South African Journal of Education, 40(2), 1-10.

Osborne, J. (1998). Science education without a laboratory? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 156-173). Routledge.

Panela, T. L. V., & Deniega, J. P. M. (2021). Challenging the limitations: Lived experiences of college instructors in Calbayog City, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(9).

Resnik, D. B. (2020). What Is Ethics in Research & Why Is It Important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-21.

Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2023). Learning to teach science. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1162-1196). Routledge.

Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 84-104.

Shivolo, T. (2018). Teachers’ pedagogical orientations in grade 8 teacher-orchestrated chemistry practical demonstrations: A focus on Oshikoto Region, Namibia. Master’s Thesis. University of Johannesburg. Johannesburg. https://hdl.handle.net/10210/402293

Shivolo, T., & Mokiwa, H. O. (2024). Secondary school teachers’ conceptions of teaching science practical work through inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 10(2), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.693

Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. Cyberspace.

Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.

Twahirwa, J., & Twizeyimana, E. (2020). Effectiveness of Practical Work in Physics on Academic Performance among Learners at the selected secondary school in Rwanda. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i2.7

Varpio, L., O’Brien, B., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L., Ajjawi, R., & Paradis, E. (2021). The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research. Medical Education, 55(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14348

Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in school science: which way now? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062487

Downloads

Published

2024-11-04

How to Cite

Shivolo, T., Kamina, C. U. ., Nembenge, G. ., Nangutuwala, M. M. ., & Simasiku, F. S. (2024). Evaluating the Teaching of Physical Science Practical Work at a Selected Resource-Constrained Secondary School in Rundu Circuit, Kavango East Region. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.14

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>