Enhancing Independent Learning and Conceptual Understanding of Integration in Higher Education Mathematics with Photomath

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i2.61

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Independent Learning, Integration, Photomath

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of the Photomath application to promote self-directed learning and integrated conceptual understanding among first-year pre-service mathematics teachers studying at a private higher learning institution during the 2024–2025 academic year. Fastened in a quantitative quasi-experimental survey design, the study targeted 46 purposively selected students pursuing mathematics-related subject combinations. Data were collected using a validated Likert-scale questionnaire designed to capture students’ attitudes, learning autonomy, and levels of conceptual understanding. The instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with reliability coefficients ranging between 0.76 and 0.84. Statistical analysis using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) revealed statistically significant effects of Photomath usage on students’ attitudes toward mathematics, their conceptual understanding, and their capacity for independent learning. The findings indicated that the app positively influenced learners’ motivation and engagement by providing immediate feedback and step-by-step solution pathways. These features enabled students to follow logical problem-solving processes, thereby supporting deeper engagement with mathematical procedures and concepts. Participants further reported that Photomath facilitated the integration of mathematical ideas through its visual representations, symbolic explanations, and structured guidance. Such affordances supported self-directed learning by allowing learners to verify solutions independently, revisit explanations, and regulate their own pace of learning. While a minority of respondents expressed concerns regarding potential overreliance on the application and the risk of superficial understanding when used uncritically, the overall perceptions remained strongly positive. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that Photomath functions not only as a computational tool but also as a pedagogical aid that supports learner-centered instructional approaches. When used thoughtfully, the application has the potential to enhance conceptual understanding, foster autonomy, and complement formal mathematics instruction in higher education contexts.

References

Abuzar, M., Mahmudulhassan, & Muthoifin. (2025). University students’ trust in AI: Examining reliance and strategies for critical engagement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(7), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i07.52875

Al-Adwan, A. S., Meet, R. K., Anand, S., Shukla, G. P., Alsharif, R., & Dabbaghia, M. (2025). Understanding continuous use intention of technology among higher education teachers in emerging economy: Evidence from integrated TAM, TPACK, and UTAUT model. Studies in higher education, 50(3), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2343955

Başgül, M., & Coştu, B. (2025). The effect of Education 4.0 tools on 7th grade students’ learning outcomes and attitudes in the electrical circuits unit. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15645–15689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13404-z

Elhilal, A. (2025). Digital conceptual mapping for enhancing mathematical concept formation and creative mathematical problem-solving through cognitive flexibility skills: a mixed methods study. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2494945. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2494945

Elmahdi, O. H., Balla, A. S., Abdelrady, A. H., Osman, E., & Ahmed, A. O. (2025). AI-driven vocabulary acquisition in EFL higher education: interdisciplinary insights. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8760

Fairman, J. C., Feng, M., & Roschelle, J. (2025). teachers’ use of learning analytics data from students’ online math practice assignments to better focus instruction. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00170-3

Glaser, C. (2025). Youth and generation in South African history (2018). In Rethinking South Africa’s past (pp. 419-440). Routledge.

Gondwe, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence, journalism, and the Ubuntu robot in sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a normative framework. Digital Journalism, 13(4), 826-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2311258

Mekheimer, M. (2025). Technological self-efficacy, motivation, and contextual factors in advanced EFL e-learning: a mixed-methods study of strategy use and satisfaction. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04947-0

Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Mahmud, M. M. (2025). Exploring learners’ experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 917-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13065-4

Putri, S. A. (2025). Analysing students’ weaknesses in using artificial intelligence for English learning purposes. Tadangate Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 11-24.

Rao, Y., Yin, R., Chen, R., Li, J., & Chen, Y. (2025). The potential of dynamic mathematics systems to promote mathematical abstraction levels of secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15587–15619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13373-3

Tang, J., Zhai, Y., Li, L., Liu, P., & Deng, H. (2025). Mobile learning for less-commonly taught languages: design and application. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 5(1), 23–55. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9373-485X

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

Zhang, L., Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2025). Approaches to supporting and measuring mathematical problem posing: A systematic review of interventions in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 2225–2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10542-1

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Niyibizi, O., & Singirankabo, J. N. (2026). Enhancing Independent Learning and Conceptual Understanding of Integration in Higher Education Mathematics with Photomath. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 3(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v3i2.61

Similar Articles

11-20 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.