Junior High School Science Teachers’ Perception of Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i2.31

Keywords:

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Science Education, Teacher Competencies, Science Teachers, Professional Development

Abstract

The integration of technology into education has become indispensable in fostering effective teaching and learning, particularly in the sciences. However, the ability of teachers to blend technological tools with pedagogical strategies and content knowledge is captured in a framework known as Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Despite the growing emphasis on technology in education, limited research exists on the TPACK competencies of science teachers in Ghana. Understanding these competencies is vital for informing professional development programs and enhancing the quality of science education in Junior High Schools (JHS). This study explored three main questions: (1) How do JHS science teachers perceive their understanding of TPACK constructs? (2) What are the correlations between these constructs, their collective impact on TPACK, and (3) what construct is the strongest predictor of TPACK? A descriptive survey design utilizing questionnaires to collect primary data from 145 JHS science teachers was employed. Data were analyzed using frequency distributions, means, standard deviations, and multiple regression. The findings revealed that science teachers demonstrate a high perceived understanding of the TPACK constructs. There were strong positive correlations between TPACK and its six constituent constructs. Notably, Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) emerged as the most significant predictor of overall TPACK competency. These results underscore the robust self-perceptions of TPACK competencies among JHS science teachers in the study area, suggesting a strong foundation for technology integration in science education. The study’s findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, educational administrators, and teacher educators in Ghana. The study recommends the development of targeted professional development programs in technology to strengthen teachers’ TPACK capacity to improve science education outcomes in Ghanaian junior high schools. Furthermore, the identification of TCK as a key predictor highlights the importance of focusing on the intersection of technology and content knowledge in teacher training initiatives.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

  • Joseph Kobina Baah, Department of Science Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana

    Joseph Kobina Baah is a science teacher at the Junior High School level with over two decades of experience. He holds a Master of Philosophy in Science Education from the University of Cape Coast. Mr. Baah's research interests include the use of technology to enact science concepts.

  • Kofi Acheaw Owusu, Department of Science Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana

    Dr. Kofi Acheaw Owusu is a senior lecturer at the Department of Science Education of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. His research focuses on Science and Biology Education, Innovative pedagogies in science, Science teachers’ TPACK, and STEM education. He teaches and supervises students at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. He is a facilitator for organizing continuous professional development for lecturers and teachers in institutions affiliated to the University of Cape Coast.

References

Açıkgül, K., & Aslaner, R. (2020). Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2023-2047. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y

Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana Post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1665– 1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z

Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers, through teacher design teams. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.827

Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2018). The relationship between ownership structure and firm financial performance: Evidence from Jordan. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2016-0051

Allan, W. C., Erickson, J. L., Brookhouse, P., & Johnson, J. L. (2010). Teacher professional development through a collaborative curriculum project-an example of TPACK in Maine. TechTrends, 54(6), 36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0452-x

Appiah, M. K. (2016). Incidence of plagiarism among undergraduate students in higher educational institutions in Ghana. International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences, 6(3), 269-279.

Appiah, S., & Mfum-Appiah, J. (2019). Appraisal of Religious and Moral Education (RME) Curriculum: Pedagogical Knowledge Practices in Junior High Schools (JHSs) in Ghana.

Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.

Asare-Danso, S. (2017). Assessing technological, pedagogical and content knowledge of religious and moral educators of Colleges of Education in Ghana: A survey.

Assadi, N., & Hibi, W. (2020). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematics TPACK through an Integrated Pedagogical Course. Creative Education, 11(10), 1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110138

Azmi, N. (2017). The benefits of using ICT in the EFL classroom: From perceived utility to potential challenges. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 111-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p111

Basaran, B. (2020). Examining Preservice Teachers’ TPACK-21 Efficacies with Clustering Analysis in Terms of Certain Variables. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 84-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2020.03.005

Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275

Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct ‘just right?’ Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachersâ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 136-155.

Bulut, S. (2012). Investigating perceptions of preservice mathematics teachers on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) regarding geometry (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/22026

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). A Review of the Quantitative Measures of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (2nd ed., pp. 87-106). Routledge.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. S. (2011). Modelling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007

Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008). Random walk models in biology. Journal Of The Royal Society Interface, 5(25), 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0014

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

De Leeuw, E. D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of official statistics, 21(5), 233-255.

Dunmire, R. E. (2010). The use of instructional technology in the classroom: selection and effectiveness. United States Military Academy. Unpublished Master’s Thesis.

Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086

Ejemeyovwi, J. O., Osabuohien, E. S., & Bowale, E. I. (2020). ICT adoption, innovation and financial development in a digital world: empirical analysis from Africa. Transnational Corporations Review, 13(1), 16-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2020.1851124

Ekrem, S., & Recep, Ç. (2014). Examining Preservice EFL Teachers’ TPACK Competencies in Turkey. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2014.2.2

Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707-2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400

Fabian, A., Lachner, A., & Backfisch, I. (2020). Cleaning up the Mess: A Systematic Review on the Diverse Conceptualizations of the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4278

Field, M., & Golubitsky, M. (2009). Symmetry in chaos: a search for pattern in mathematics, art, and nature. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Fischer, G., Lundin, J., & Lindberg, J. O. J. (2019). Rethinking and reinventing learning, education, and collaboration in the digital age. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 241-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2020-0051

Fu, H. (2013). Concentration and homogenization of international movie sources: Examining foreign film import profiles. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 813- 835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00321.x

Gastelú, C. A. T., Kiss, G., & Domínguez, A. L. (2015). Level of ICT competencies at the university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 137-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.638

Ghauri, P., Grønhaug, K., & Strange, R. (2020). Research methods in business studies. Cambridge University Press.

Gilakjani, A. P. & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). The relationship between L2 reading comprehension and schema theory: A matter of text familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 142-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2011.V1.24

Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5).

Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.

Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: case studies of science teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.

Helppolainen, S., & Aksela, M. (2015). Science teachers’ ICT use from a viewpoint of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Teknologia Kemian Opetuksessa, 1(1), 2-2.

Jang, S. J. (2010). Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1744-1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.020

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2011). On learning to subvert signs: Literacy, technology and the TPACK framework. California Reader, 44(2).

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators, 1(1), 3-29.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Lai, K-W., & Pratt, K. (2008). Positive to a Degree: The Effects of ICT Use in New Zealand Secondary Schools. Computers in the Schools, 24(3-4), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v24n03_07

Lam, T. C., & Kolic, M. (2008). Effects of semantic incompatibility on rating response. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 248-260. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0146621607301094

Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4

Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6

Liu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service K12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585929

Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Laane, H. (2019). Estonian in-service teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ perceptions of content, pedagogy, and technology knowledge, based on the tpack framework. In Digital Turn in Schools—Research, Policy, Practice: Proceedings of ICEM 2018 Conference (pp. 111-122). Springer Singapore.

Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Suviste, R. (2018). Perceptions of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among pre-service teachers in Estonia. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 741-755. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-017-9633-y

Mai, M. Y., & Hamzah, M. (2017). The development of an assessment instrument of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for primary science teachers in Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(1), 93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.37134/jsspj.vol7.no1.8.2017

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mtebe, J. S., & Raphael, C. (2018). Eliciting In-Service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for 21st-Century Skills in Tanzania. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 263-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.288

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2012). Research methods dictionary. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NaCCA]. (2020). Science common core programme curriculum (Basic 7 - 10). NACCA. https://curriculum.nacca.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SCIENCE-CCP-CURRICULUM-B7-B10-ZERO-DRAFT.pdf

Okoli, T. T., & Tewari, D. D. (2020). Investigating the policy implications of financial technology shocks on macroeconomic stability: evidence from emerging African economies. African Journal of Development Studies, 10(3), 123-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2020/10n3a7

Oloruntoba, S. O., Ishola, E. B., & Ekanade, I. K. (2020). Globalization, Poverty, and Development in Africa: Looking Past to the Future. In Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order (pp. 725- 748). Springer, Cham.

Owusu, K. A., Conner, L., & Astall, C. (2015). Assessing New Zealand high school science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(3), 345-373. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147320/

Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.30935/cet.512515

Pallant, J. (2010). A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. Allen & Unwin.

Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2015). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4

Qui, M., Le Bert, N., Chan, W. P. W., Tan, M., Hang, S. K., Hariharaputran, S., Sim, J. X. Y., Low, J. G. H., Ng, W., Wan, W. Y., Ang, T. L., Bertoletti, A., & Salazar, E. (2022). Favorable vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response profile in patients undergoing immune-modifying therapies. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 132(12), e159500. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI159500

Reddy, S. L., & Bubonia, J. (2020). Technology in education: Learning opportunities for teachers and students. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 112(1), 46-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14307/JFCS112.1.46

Rets, I., Rienties, B., & Lewis, T. (2020). Transforming pre-service teacher education through virtual exchange: a mixed-methods analysis of perceived TPACK development. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1826983

Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323

Rukmana, D., & Handayani, S. L. (2021). Exploring the profiles of pre-service teachers technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on earth and space science offline and online course. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 42-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i1.7882

Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent‐driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x

Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: exploring the complex interplay of teacher‐ related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 160- 172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00383.x

Sarkar, S. (2012). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1), 30-41.

Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q. A., Hussain, M. S., Basheer, M. F., Hameed, W. U., & Chaudhry, N.I. (2020). The role of digital learning toward students’ satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: a post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10 (2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-04-2020-0063

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Sintawati, M., & Abdurrahman, G. (2020, April). The effectiveness of blended learning to improve pre-service teacher TPaCK in developing multimedia learning mathematics at elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1521, 032014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032014

Su, M. & Foulger, T. (2019). We Aren’t There Yet: A Progression of Literature on TPACK Measures to Assess Technology Integration. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2534-2542). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Tabachnick, B. G. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

Tezci, E. (2011). Turkish primary school teachers’ perceptions of school culture regarding ICT integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 429–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9205-6

Tilya, F. (2008). IT and Educational Policy in the Sub-Saharan African Region. In Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_73

Wang, Y. L., Tsai, C. C., & Wei, S. H. (2015). The sources of science teaching self-efficacy among elementary school teachers: A mediational model approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2264-2283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1075077

Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114

Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9

Yalley, C. E. (2016). Investigating the technological pedagogical content knowledge of social studies teachers in the senior high schools in the Kumasi Metropolis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast).

Yet, D., Oostdik, K., Lenz, K., Nye, J., Schelling, K., Bruski, S., ... & Storts, D. R. (2014). Developmental validation of the PowerPlex® Fusion System for analysis of casework and reference samples: a 24-locus multiplex for new database standards. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 12, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.013

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Baah, J. K., & Owusu, K. A. (2025). Junior High School Science Teachers’ Perception of Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i2.31

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.