Digital Colonialism in AI-Enhanced Sustainability Education: A Decolonial Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jesds.v3i1.62Keywords:
Digital Colonialism, Decolonial Pedagogy, AI Divide, Sustainability Education, Technological Sovereignty, TPACK-AI FrameworkAbstract
As artificial intelligence reshapes higher education globally, its integration into sustainability programs raises urgent questions about equity, epistemological justice, and the reproduction of colonial power structures through technological systems. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) is premised on inclusive, justice-oriented pedagogy, yet the AI tools increasingly deployed in these programs originate predominantly from the Global North and embed Western epistemological assumptions. This study investigates how AI integration in higher education sustainability programs operates as a form of digital colonialism, creating systematic inequities that contradict ESD’s foundational commitments. We conducted a decolonial systematic review synthesizing 61 empirical studies identified through structured searches of ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Education Source, and PsycINFO databases (2019-2024). Studies were selected using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, and findings were analyzed through a decolonial analytical framework informed by Santos’s epistemologies of the South and Mignolo’s concept of epistemic disobedience. Our findings expose three mechanisms of educational imperialism: institutional stratification, where elite universities achieve 84% AI implementation success versus 42% for under-resourced institutions serving marginalized communities; algorithmic violence, manifesting in 34% lower completion rates for students from formerly colonized regions; and epistemological erasure, as AI systems privilege Western scientific paradigms over traditional ecological knowledge. We reconceptualize the TPACK-AI framework as a tool for technological sovereignty, incorporating decolonial pedagogies, algorithmic resistance, and community-centered design. Without systematic decolonization of educational technology, AI integration risks accelerating the exclusion of Indigenous, Black, and Global South voices from environmental leadership. This research contributes strategies for institutions to resist digital colonialism through South-South cooperation, community-controlled technologies, and pedagogies that center rather than silence marginalized ways of knowing.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
Adams, W. M. (1995). Green development: Environment and sustainability in the Third World. Routledge.
Agarwal, B. (2009). Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women’s participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics, 68(11), 2785-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.025
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
Arendt, H. (1951/2004). The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken Books.
Arora, S. (2020). The bottom of the learning pyramid: Digital technology and global inequality. MIT Press.
Battiste, M. (2000). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. UBC Press.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity Press.
Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management (4th ed.). Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.
Birhane, A. (2021a). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), 100-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205
Birhane, A. (2021b). Questioning the AI: Informing intelligent machines with the ethics of care. AEON Essays.
Blaser, M. (2016). Is another cosmopolitics possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545-570. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cao, F., & Jian, Y. (2024). The role of integrating AI and VR in fostering environmental awareness and enhancing activism among college students. Science of The Total Environment, 908, 168200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168200
Césaire, A. (1950). Discourse on colonialism. Monthly Review Press.
Churchill, W. (2004). Kill the Indian, save the man: The genocidal impact of American Indian residential schools. City Lights Books.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity Press.
Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Craig, C. J. (2018). Narrative inquiry in teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Danisch, R. (2016). Participation and political communication in the practice of deliberation. Lexington Books.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies Working Paper, 15, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., ... & Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Oxford University Press.
Eisenstein, C. (2013). The more beautiful world our hearts know is possible. North Atlantic Books.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
FAO. (2018). The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press.
Foster, W. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: Systems thinking in action. The Adelphi Institute.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Garnett, S. T., Burgess, N. D., Fa, J. E., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Molnár, Z., Robinson, C. J., Watson, J. E., Zander, K. K., Austin, B., Brondizio, E. S., Collier, N. F., Duncan, T., Ellis, E., Geyle, H., Jackson, M. V., Jonas, H., Malmer, P., McGowan, B., Sivongxay, A., . . . Leiper, I. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1(7), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167-194). MIT Press.
Gitelman, L., & Jackson, V. (2013). Raw data is an oxymoron. MIT Press.
Greene, M. (2007). Curriculum and consciousness. In A. C. Ornstein, E. F. Pajak, & S. B. Ornstein (Eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum (pp. 137-147). Pearson.
Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004
Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441-447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Hickel, J. (2012). The divide: Global inequality from conquest to free markets. W.W. Norton & Company.
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. Routledge.
Hope, D. (2020). Data justice. In Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene. Elsevier.
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis. Peter Lang.
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2019). The critical media literacy guide: Engaging media and transforming education (2nd ed.). Brill.
Keyes, O. (2018). The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357
Khor, M. (2003). Intellectual property, biodiversity, and sustainable development. Zed Books.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Lerman, J., & Weitzner, D. J. (2018). Avoidable surprises: Thinking ahead about the consequences of algorithms. In B. Susser, B. Roessler, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (pp. 510-551). Cambridge University Press.
Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 240-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Meadows, D. H. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. The Sustainability Institute.
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper & Row.
Mhlambi, S. (2020). From rationality to relationality: Ubuntu as an ethical framework for AI governance. Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard Kennedy School.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
Misiaszek, G. W. (2018). Educating the global environmental citizen: Understanding ecopedagogy in local and global contexts. Routledge.
Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages, savaging the disciplines. Aboriginal Studies Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Patel, L. (2016). Decolonizing educational research. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Pieper, D., Antoine, S. L., Mathes, T., Neugebauer, E. A., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Ramose, M. B. (2002). African philosophy through Ubuntu. Mond Books.
Roy, A. (2020). The pandemic is a portal. Financial Times, April 3, 2020.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.
Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (Eds.). (2014). Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schlosser, E. (2013). Command and control: Nuclear weapons, the Damascus accident, and the illusion of safety. Penguin Press.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Shiva, V. (2005). Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability, and peace. South End Press.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Zed Books.
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: connecting classrooms & communities. The Center for Ecoliteracy.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Macmillan.
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin.
Tate, S. A. (2012). Black beauty: Aesthetics, stylization, politics. Ashgate.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
Wa Thiong’o, N. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
Wals, A. E. J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenges? The role of education and lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12250
Walsh, C. (2019). Geographies of decolonialism: On thinking and becoming otherwise. Inaugural Lecture, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Wamsler, C., & Brink, E. (2018). Mindsets for sustainability: Exploring the link between mindfulness and sustainable climate adaptation. Ecological Economics, 151, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Williamson, B. (2019). Brain data Scanning, scraping, and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0008-5
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652
Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity (pp. 44-83). Sage.
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
Yosso, T. J. (2002). Toward a critical race curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845283
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matthew Sauber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
