Teacher Authority and Student Learning in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Power and Pedagogy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70232/jtal.v2i2.28

Keywords:

AI-Mediated Classrooms, Artificial Intelligence, Pedagogical Practices, Student Learning Performance, Teacher Authority

Abstract

This paper explored how teacher authority, pedagogic practice, and student learning performance are related in AI-mediated classrooms of secondary schools. Specifically, the study looked at how teacher authority directly affects pedagogical practices and student learning, and the mediating roles of the pedagogical practices. A convergent parallel design of mixed methods was embraced. The quantitative data were gathered on 320 teachers in Gusau Metropolis, Zamfara State, Nigeria, and the qualitative data were gathered from 20 purposely selected teachers on the basis of open-ended responses. To test the hypotheses, the study used descriptive and inferential statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and mediation analysis. Qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis. The results from both types of data were used and interpreted to understand the phenomenon of the study. The results showed that teacher authority, pedagogical practices, and student learning were generally at moderate to high levels among participants. Teacher authority significantly affected both pedagogical practices and student learning. Pedagogical practices were the strongest predictor of student learning and partly mediated the relationship between teacher authority and learning outcomes. Qualitative findings also showed that in AI-mediated classrooms, teacher authority is increasingly shown through epistemic leadership, instructional guidance, and ethical oversight of AI use, emphasizing the ongoing importance of teachers in creating effective learning experiences. The findings of the study imply that AI does not undermine the authority of teachers; instead, it redefines it as a pedagogy. The study concludes that well-organized, autonomy-supportive teaching is the key to maintaining student learning outcomes in the AI age.

References

Akanzire, B. N., Nyaaba, M., & Nabang, M. (2025). Generative AI in teacher education: Teacher educators’ perception and preparedness. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), Article ep2508. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15887

Anders, B. A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns, 4(3), Article 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100694

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, Article 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Simone, F., Lim, C. P., & Bedenlier, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221

Borgonovi, F. (2025). AI and teacher roles. OECD Education Working Papers.

Budhathoki, T., Zirar, A., Njoya, E. T., & Timsina, A. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and anxiety: a cross-country analysis utilising the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2333937

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

De Putter-Smits, L. G., Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., Runhaar, P. R., Timmer, M., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2025). Exploring the role of generative AI in science teacher education programs: A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9, Article 100492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100492

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Espartinez, A. S., & colleagues. (2024). Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-methodology study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hooshyar, D., Tammets, K., Ley, T., Aus, K., & Kollom, K. (2023). Learning analytics in supporting student agency: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813662

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1

Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221

Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Du Boulay, B. (2021). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076

Mammadov, S., & Schroeder, K. (2023). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between autonomy support and positive learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, Article 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102235

Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review on opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Algorithms, 18(6), Article 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & others. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022- 11316-w

OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). AI adoption in the education system: International insights. OECD Publishing.

Paolucci, C., Vancini, S., Bex II, R. T., Cavanaugh, C., Salama, C., & de Araujo, Z. (2024). A review of learning analytics opportunities and challenges for K-12 education. Heliyon, 10(4), Article e25767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25767

Patall, E. A., Yates, N., & colleagues. (2023). A meta-analysis of teachers’ provision of structure in the classroom and students’ academic competence beliefs, engagement, and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2274104

Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2

Selwyn, N., Ljungqvist, M., & Sonesson, A. (2025). When the prompting stops: exploring teachers’ work around the educational frailties of generative AI tools. Learning, Media and Technology, 50(3), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2537959

Song, Z., Qin, J., Jin, F., Cheung, W. M., & Lin, C.-H. (2025). A case study of teachers’ generative artificial intelligence integration processes and factors influencing them. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, Article 105157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105157

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Wainaina, P. K., & Sun, Y. (2025). Educators’ perceptions and willingness to integrate generative Artificial Intelligence in teaching and research: evidence from Kenyan higher education. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00820-z

Wang, Y. (2024). Algorithmic decisions in education governance: implications and challenges. Discover Education, 3, Article 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00337-x

Williamson, B. (2024). The social life of AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5

Wu, D., & Dong, X. (2024). Autonomy support, peer relations, and teacher-student interactions: Implications for psychological well-being in language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1358776. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358776

Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Liew, J., & Kogut, A. (2023). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of self-regulated learning interventions on academic achievement in online and blended environments in K-12 and higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(16), 2911–2931. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2151935

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K-12 education. European Journal of Education, 59(2), Article e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599

Downloads

Published

31-08-2026

How to Cite

Adedeji, I. O. (2026). Teacher Authority and Student Learning in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Power and Pedagogy. Journal of Technology-Assisted Learning, 2(2), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.70232/jtal.v2i2.28

Similar Articles

21-21 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.