Agency Building with Early Research Exposure: A Study of an Undergraduate Science Education Exposure Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v1i2.11Keywords:
Chemistry Education, Critical Science Agency, Science Identity, Undergraduate Research ExperienceAbstract
Undergraduate research exposure provides students with opportunities to positively perceive their association with their scientific discipline through agentic experiences, and thereby fostering their disciplinary identity building. In the present study, we explore students’ experiences of participating in an undergraduate level research exposure camp in Chemistry discipline. The camp is organized under a national level nurture initiative for undergraduate science and engineering students in India. It is a two-week long residential camp in which students are engaged in lectures on theoretical topics in chemistry, problem solving sessions, long laboratory exercises, abstract writing session, and students’ seminars. The camp also serves as a first step to select a small cohort of students based on their performance in the different activities during the camp for extended research projects opportunities. We apply the critical science agency framework to examine students’ experiences during the camp, and how understand how students connect their prior experiences and future career related choices with their camp experiences. The qualitative analysis describes students’ accounts of the emergence of agentic personalities at the entry, during, and beyond the camp. We noted instances in which students’ decisions and subsequent actions of applying to and attending the camp surfaced, and through students’ narration interpreted how some of these were markers of critical science agency. Based on authors’ understanding, this is the first, and one of the few studies conducted using critical science agency framework with science undergraduate students about their early research experiences. The study provides insights about potential programmatic features for similar undergraduate research camps in India as well as on a global platform.
References
Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2009a). Critical physics agency: Further unraveling the intersections of subject matter knowledge, learning, and taking action. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9155-4
Basu, S. J., Calabrese Barton, A., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009b). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 345-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9135-8
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210-230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3648256
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
Blackburn, M. (2004). Understanding agency beyond school-sanctioned activities. Theory Into Practice, 43, 102–110.
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). A longitudinal study of how quality mentorship and research experience integrate underrepresented minorities into STEM careers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066
Fostering Environmental Science Agency In Youth-focused Community and Citizen Science. (n.d.). UC Davis School of Education. https://education.ucdavis.edu/sites/main/files/ccs_yccs_research_brief_esa_final_0.pdf
Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189-214. 10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7
Krochalk, P., & Hope, E. (1995). A framework for integrating faculty discipline-related research with classroom teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(2), 3–15.
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Linn, M., Palmer E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone E. (2015) Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and Opportunities. Science, 347.
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
Magolda, M. B. B. (1999). Creating contexts for learning and self-authorship: Constructive-developmental pedagogy. Vanderbilt University Press.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook for qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
NIUS. (n.d.). NIUS Proposal 2004. National Initiative on Undergraduate Science HBCSE-TIFR. https://nius.hbcse.tifr.res.in/nius-proposal-2004/
Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199902)36:2
Schneider, C.G. (2008) Introduction. Liberal education and high-impact pedagogies. In Scott, D., Hughes, G., Evans, C., Burke, P.J., Walter, C., and Watson, D. (2014) Learning transitions in higher education. Palgrave.
Sen, D. I., & Ladage, S. (2023). National initiative on undergraduate science program in chemistry. Current Science, 125(8), 831-836. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v125/i8/831-836
Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Greenwood Publishing Group
Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422- 005-9009-2
Valutis, S., Rubin, D., & Bell, M. (2012). Professional socialization and social work values: Who are we teaching? Social Work Education, 31(8), 146-1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.610785
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Deepika Bansal, Deepa Chari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
